|
#1
| |||
| |||
| ya'll gotta relax OS/x won't run Windows apps. Windows won't run Mac apps. Just lighten up and enjoy the evolution. It's a good thing, this Intel thing. Honest.
__________________ ---------------------------- chris@chornbe.com http://learntomac.blogspot.com/ http://motorcyclemanifesto.blogspot.com/ |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| thank you. we need more voices of reason.
__________________ The learning curve of changing from PC to Mac isnt steep, but the hill is littered with rocks and poisonous vipers. |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Chornbe's right. It doesn't matter what chip our Macs are running on, it's still OSX. These new Macs are going to be amazingly fast. There STILL isn't going to be any Windows market share on our platform. Change is good, ya'll.
__________________ • 2.66GHz Mac Pro Quad Xeon • 2.2GHz Santa Rosa MacBook Pro • 2.0GHz iMac Core Duo • 8GB iPhone |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| If they are faster then that's better for everyone. I say good. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| No more switch boxes! I think this is going to be a great thing... if I can dual boot into OS X and Windows (as even Apple seems to think I'll be able to do at some point soon after the switch), that means I only have to upgrade/replace one computer moving forward. No more separate boxes for OS X and Windows/Linux! No more KVM switches! No more SMB hassles! Add to this the fact that WINE will almost certainly appear on OS X, and I may not even need Windows at all for things like Quickbooks and other programs with either substandard Mac versions or no Mac version at all... My only concern is that if Macs run Windows apps as well (or pretty darn close to) as Windows itself (either in dual-boot or emulation modes), developers might not see the need to develop Mac-native programs. Still, I'm very positive about the long-term benefit of this change. I think it's going to help the Mac community in ways we haven't even realized yet. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Agreed. I can't understand why all of a sudden people are so worried about whether or not Windows will run on the up-coming Intel-Macs. I mean, come-on! We all know Windows is a buggy piece of crap. If ill-intentioned idiots want to want to run it on their new Intel-Macs - who cares! This shameful display of insecurity is not what being a member of the 'Mac class' is all about. Take pride in the fact that Apple is securing the future so Macs have the fastest processors available for the their 'superior' machines. If you care about Apple being around and competing on any level in the next decade and beyond - seriously, this is the ONLY way to go. Out of this arrangement we will get faster and cooler processors for the Apple laptops. We will get faster processors for the desktop machines that can ALWAYS compete with the competition. And, we will most likely get access to other hardware (like graphics cards) without the relevant companies having to make specialised Mac versions. Combine that with OS X "... the most advanced operating system on the planet", and Apple is primed for a win, win situation. To quote an earlier post; "Keep in mind that Macintosh computers will always distingish itself from the crowd though the use of clever innovation, use of overall quality hardware components, amazing software, and the use of form and function - to create computers that not only work better but look better too." This is a smart move by Apple. |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ Mac OS X User for life ![]() "You know what is worse than being all alone in the night, captain? To be all alone in the crowd." - Ambassador Delenn |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| I can't wait to play computer games on my dual boot Macintosh with windows on a second drive. That's the biggest thing I am excited about after hearing about Windows on my Mac.
__________________ 24" iMac 2.8GHZ Core 2 Exteme OS 10.5 | 4GB RAM | 1TB HDD Dual 1GHZ G4 MDD OS 10.5 | 2GB RAM | 800GB HDD | iSight TiPowerBook G4 1GHZ OS 10.5 | 1GB RAM | 60GB HDD 80GB iPod | 8GB iPhone | 4GB Nano |