|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| Is Apple planning on releasing in the near future (within 3 months) a notebook that has a touch-sensitive screen that supports "digital ink?" |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| I think it would be in Apples best interest to wait and see how well the Tablet PC is received. Much like they did with the mp3 player. Then when they can find a way to totally improve upon it, release their own and take the market by storm. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Uhm, like the title of the post says, I'm waiting for 'the answer to thte tablet PC'. That is, I don't get it. Why do I want one of these? Features? No, they're bound to be underpowered just because of the form factor. A touch screen? That's it? So why do I (or any other 'average user') need a touch screen? Sure certain specialized professionals might benefit, but I don't see it. Flexability? I can take it... where? I don't need to carry my PC around, and if I do, why not get a laptop? Because of the size? Then why not an iPaq or something and leave the real computing to my desktop? These tablets don't seem much smaller than your average laptop anyway. Wow factor? My local library has had touch screen computers for 10 years. Wow. I guess I have to side with Apple on this - I don't see why they (or anyone else) need them. Give me features to enhance my computing experience, not just cause you can. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| The Tablet PCs are full fledged PCs/laptops. That's the point. They are supersets of traditional laptops. You get all the benefits of a normal laptop, (Power, all your software runs, etc.) plus the inking capabilities, and the benefits that go along with the platform's portrait (in addition to landscape) display capability (for ebooks, digital periodicals, and planning applications, etc.). |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| If Apple made something like the tablet PC and sold it for less than $800 I'd be all over that! The drawing capabilities (in photoshop even!) would be absolutly incredible! And I could work at school without having to drag around a heavy peice of platstic! *wakes up* Oh, thats right...Apple still hasn't even released a PDA. ![]()
__________________ 13" MacBook - 2GHz. 2 GB RAM. OS 10.4.7 12" iBook - 500 MHz. 640 MB RAM. (R.I.P.) TannerSite.com |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| inkwell seems too random for a tablet mac not to be in the works... but what do i know?
__________________ [ www.inversiondesigns.com ] . ] dual 867 G4 . 768 MB DDR [ . [ shut your noise tube, taco human ] |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
Maybe I'm a minority, but I would NEVER choose to read in a digital medium over print. Ebooks, digital periodicals? Why is it better for those than an ipaq, other than it's bigger (a hindrance in my opinion)? Don't get me wrong, they're 'cool' in theory. Just don't see the point. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ebert's answer man column: Macs in movies | brianleahy | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 6 | August 29th, 2003 08:42 AM |
| Correct use of "&" to release con, 2 number terminal answer? | michaelsanford | Unix & X11 | 8 | January 25th, 2003 11:56 AM |
| graphire tablet in jaguar | torres | Mac OS X System & Mac Software | 1 | August 10th, 2002 12:59 AM |
| SMB: a yes or no answer | tismey | Mac OS X System & Mac Software | 5 | November 17th, 2001 07:58 AM |
| Ill give you money if you answer this!!!!!! | whitesaint | Software Programming & Web Scripting | 2 | October 22nd, 2001 09:38 PM |