image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Content & Information > Apple News, Rumors & Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old November 18th, 2002, 05:30 PM
kendall's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,089
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
kendall is on a distinguished road
AMD new licensee, Apple

Could it be? Tommorow will tell! Though I highly doubt anyone but the man himself (Steve Jobs) would be announcing something this big. Does anyone know if he's at Comdex?

Move over AIM, here comes AA! Story first seen here.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old November 18th, 2002, 07:13 PM
kommakazi's Avatar
Hack the Planet!@#
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: /Users/peter
Posts: 319
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
kommakazi is on a distinguished road
I Followed the link there to http://www.amdzone.com and sure enough in their news on the main page there is a blurb about a large amount of Apple people attending Comdex...with rumored attendance at Hector Ruiz's keynote for AMD where they are going to announce a new lisencee (I can't spell)...scroll down more they say AMD possibly delayed release of the 64-bit Hammer processor to give Apple time to finish porting OS X....scrolling down further is a blurb (yes I like the word 'blurb' damnit!) that on Apple's open-source site there are some links for developers about the x86-64 platform for compiling applications...basically a lot of interesting little blurbs. But what could this all add up to? Were we foolish to expect Apple to wait an entire year for IBM's PPC 970 stuck with sh*tty Moto G4's? A year is a long time...the G4 is dying quickly ( mostly due to incompetence on Moto's part, but nevertheless still dying... ). AMD's new 64-bit Hammer processor is right on the horizon...Apple could really be in place to take it and blow the consumer market apart with 64-bit desktop machines....I don't think they'll abandon the G4 completely right away...keep it in the i/eMac and shove it into the next iBooks, possibly keep it in the TiBooks even for one more revision. I've never taken the Apple on x86 rumors too seriously until now...and with all the past ones it adds up, I think something is definately brewing here. Perhaps Apple will still use the PPC 970 when it finally is released...give consumers the option of a PPC or x86 chip in their PowerMac...or maybe instead of all that I just said I'm just totally off my rocker and going insane. Either is quite possible at this point. What do all of you think?

Also just noted that the weekly poll on the main amdzone.com page is "Next AMD Customer?
Is Apple or Dell more likely to be the next AMD customer?"
0 Apple is really thinking different!
0 Dude, Dell!

Interestingly enough Apple is favored 58.48% to Dell's 41.52%...
Just a stupid poll but makes me wonder even more...
__________________
If it's a penny for your thoughts and you always put your two cents worth in, who's getting all these extra pennies?!

The Home Network:
iceBook: 500mhz G3, 384MB RAM, Mac OS X.II.II
B&W Tower: 450mhz G3, 512MB RAM, Mac OS X.II.II
Rev. A iMac: 233mhz G3, 256MB RAM, Mac OS 9.2.2
Mac LC III+: 33mhz 68030, 12MB RAM, NetBSD 1.5.2
Stupid PC: 233mhz Athalon K-6, 80MB RAM, Rhapsody DR2
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old November 18th, 2002, 08:12 PM
Reloaded
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: I'm not really here.
Posts: 760
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
MacLuv is on a distinguished road

Last edited by MacLuv; December 1st, 2002 at 06:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old November 18th, 2002, 08:25 PM
Reloaded
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: I'm not really here.
Posts: 760
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
MacLuv is on a distinguished road

Last edited by MacLuv; December 1st, 2002 at 06:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old November 18th, 2002, 08:37 PM
kommakazi's Avatar
Hack the Planet!@#
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: /Users/peter
Posts: 319
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
kommakazi is on a distinguished road
There's one giant hole I can poke in this whole theory though: AltiVec. Too much has already been moved toward AltiVec to just drop it off suddenly, major developers and the scientific community would be outraged at such an action... It is possible that AMD could aquire a liscence to it or already have...though I'm sure we would have heard about this already if they had. Any thought on this?
__________________
If it's a penny for your thoughts and you always put your two cents worth in, who's getting all these extra pennies?!

The Home Network:
iceBook: 500mhz G3, 384MB RAM, Mac OS X.II.II
B&W Tower: 450mhz G3, 512MB RAM, Mac OS X.II.II
Rev. A iMac: 233mhz G3, 256MB RAM, Mac OS 9.2.2
Mac LC III+: 33mhz 68030, 12MB RAM, NetBSD 1.5.2
Stupid PC: 233mhz Athalon K-6, 80MB RAM, Rhapsody DR2
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old November 18th, 2002, 08:37 PM
kendall's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,089
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
kendall is on a distinguished road
Moving away from PPC would be the smartest thing Apple could possibly do.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old November 18th, 2002, 08:47 PM
wiz wiz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sol
Posts: 537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
wiz is on a distinguished road
and i thought PPC was better than the x86
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old November 18th, 2002, 08:49 PM
kommakazi's Avatar
Hack the Planet!@#
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: /Users/peter
Posts: 319
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
kommakazi is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally posted by MacLuv
Who cares about RISC processing? It's over, man, we've been through this before...
Interestingly enough, the AMD Opteron (and even the Athlon) has many features of RISC processors: it supports out-of-order execution, has multiple floating-point units, and can issue up to 9 instructions simultaneously. Detailed info here: http://www.phys.uu.nl/~steen/web02/opteron.html
__________________
If it's a penny for your thoughts and you always put your two cents worth in, who's getting all these extra pennies?!

The Home Network:
iceBook: 500mhz G3, 384MB RAM, Mac OS X.II.II
B&W Tower: 450mhz G3, 512MB RAM, Mac OS X.II.II
Rev. A iMac: 233mhz G3, 256MB RAM, Mac OS 9.2.2
Mac LC III+: 33mhz 68030, 12MB RAM, NetBSD 1.5.2
Stupid PC: 233mhz Athalon K-6, 80MB RAM, Rhapsody DR2

Last edited by kommakazi; November 18th, 2002 at 09:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apple- Yesturday, Today, and Tomorrow GroundZeroX Opinions, & Open Letters 19 May 9th, 2005 06:56 PM
Future of Apple With x86 pezagent Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 28 August 26th, 2002 11:41 AM
Apple to move to AMD x86 after 2003? chemistry_geek Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 21 July 15th, 2002 07:02 PM
Apple observations and opinions TellarHK Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 4 May 30th, 2002 11:36 PM
Apple: Forget XP, try the Mac tagliatelle Bob's Place 1 November 25th, 2001 06:12 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:37 PM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.