|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| MacUser UK article on Marklar MacUser (UK) posted an interesting article yesterday (10th December) about OS X on PC architecture. I'm not wishing to revive any tired debates, but the article was interesting as it seemed to suggest OS X on Intel was not so much a fall back plan but possibly part of a broader strategy. Quote:
|
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Nothing new here...
__________________ If it's a penny for your thoughts and you always put your two cents worth in, who's getting all these extra pennies?! The Home Network: iceBook: 500mhz G3, 384MB RAM, Mac OS X.II.II B&W Tower: 450mhz G3, 512MB RAM, Mac OS X.II.II Rev. A iMac: 233mhz G3, 256MB RAM, Mac OS 9.2.2 Mac LC III+: 33mhz 68030, 12MB RAM, NetBSD 1.5.2 Stupid PC: 233mhz Athalon K-6, 80MB RAM, Rhapsody DR2 |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| I think a lot of new things have been introduced in this article concerning Marklar. Namely Apple considering releasing an x86 version of OS X along with their PPC offering. Marklar has become more than a last ditch effort to salvage a dying Apple. It stands a chance of become a refuge for PC users fed up with Palladium. Also, considering Apple may be leveraging the release of Marklar based on Microsoft pulling support for Office on Mac, it would seem Apple has Microsoft between a rock and a hard place. I think OS X would sell very well on PC hardware. Also, if PC users find they prefer OS X over Windows, chances are their next computer would be a Mac. That is of course if Apple can get their hardware prices more in line with PCs. |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Apple would also have to make significantly faster hardware for people to even consider buying their stuff. Currently Apple can (and does, to some extent) take advantage of being the only supplier of Macs. Think about it, if OS X worked on all the various cheaper, faster PC hardware out there, would simply having cooler enclosures be enough to stick with Apple hardware? Apple would have to offer significant benefits of having an Apple-only system.
__________________ Currently Mac-challenged ![]() "God's final message to his Creation: We Apologise For The Inconvenience" |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Same ol' same ol'..... Whilst such a move would smack of a last throw of the dice on Apple's part I think it's no bad thing to have options. It also gets people talking about Apple which is no bad thing. (All publicity is good publicity etc etc) I'd be pretty surpised to see it actually happen though!
__________________ PowerMac G5 Dual 2ghz + PowerMac G3 300mhz + iBook 800mhz + 15gb iPod + OS X 10.4.x + Me = Happy |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| Does "Marklar" have anything to do with the friendly people from the planet Marklar in South Park episode 311 (Starvin' Marvin in space)?
__________________ My personal Apple history (italic = dead): * 1993: Centris 610, upg -> PM 6100/60, OC to 80MHz * 1998: iMac [233MHz, 384MB, 10GB] * 2000: PowerBook G3 [233MHz, 384MB, 20GB] * 2003: PowerBook G4 [15", 867MHz, 1GB, 100GB], 10GB 2G iPod * 2004: 20GB 3G iPod, Airport Express * 2006: MBP [15", 2GHz, 2GB, 160GB] * 2007 : MBP C2D [15", 2.33GHz, 3GB, 160GB] * Plus about 15 mostly 2nd hand Macs I bought for my friends and family. About the less Mac centric me. |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| Yeah, but with Apple hardware you would get iTools free for life.... oh wait.... :-/ |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Interesting article on 802.11g (aka Airport Extreme) | binaryDigit | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 7 | May 25th, 2003 11:15 AM |
| Marklar | hazmat | Opinions, & Open Letters | 13 | December 13th, 2002 08:37 AM |
| ARTICLE: Apple keeps the torch lit with Marklar (x86) | MacLuv | Opinions, & Open Letters | 7 | November 26th, 2002 01:07 AM |
| I am looking for article about IE on Mac | designer | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 1 | June 7th, 2002 02:17 AM |
| Yet another newspaper article overlooks Macs | simX | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 5 | May 31st, 2002 11:50 AM |