image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Content & Information > Apple News, Rumors & Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old December 11th, 2002, 09:40 AM
bbloke's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,442
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 14 Posts
bbloke has a spectacular aura aboutbbloke has a spectacular aura about
MacUser UK article on Marklar

MacUser (UK) posted an interesting article yesterday (10th December) about OS X on PC architecture. I'm not wishing to revive any tired debates, but the article was interesting as it seemed to suggest OS X on Intel was not so much a fall back plan but possibly part of a broader strategy.

Quote:
"Apple could sell OS X as alternative to Windows
[MacUser] 13:21

Marklar, Apple's project to build a version of Mac OS X for Intel processors, may be of more strategic importance to the company than had previously been thought. Far from being a backup project in case the PowerPC chip falls far behind Intel, it may actually be a product that Apple will ship to current Windows users.
US sources close to the project indicated that the company was actively considering selling Marklar as a retail product, effectively allowing users to replace Windows with OS X. Apple is contemplating the move because it sees an opportunity to win market share from Windows when Microsoft introduces Palladium, a version of its operating system that implements digital rights management. Palladium could prevent users from copying any copyright material, such as music or video, without the explicit permission of the rights owner.

Marklar would have no such limitations built in, allowing Apple to appeal to Windows users frustrated by the restrictions on how they use their computers. Apple has taken the stance that users should be free to use their computers how they wish, and that it is up to copyright holders to encourage people to use them responsibly.

A second scenario in which Apple would release Marklar concerns its relationship with Microsoft. Although relations between the two companies are good, it is understood that if it worsens significantly, Marklar would be released in an effort to hit Microsoft's core operating system business. One source suggested that Marklar's release could be triggered by Microsoft cancelling the Mac version of Office.

However, launching Marklar would present some significant dangers to Apple's business. Users would be free to buy generic PC hardware instead of Macs, potentially hitting Apple's highly profitable hardware business. The company would be taking a gamble on many users continuing to prefer its stylish hardware over that of PCs.

Marklar itself is understood to be at an advanced stage of development, with builds matching those of the PowerPC OS X. Apple's bundled applications, including iTunes and iChat, have versions that run on the product.

However, Marklar requires that OS X-native Carbon and Cocoa applications are recompiled to work on Intel processors, and there is no support for pre-OS X Classic applications."
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old December 12th, 2002, 02:22 PM
kommakazi's Avatar
Hack the Planet!@#
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: /Users/peter
Posts: 319
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
kommakazi is on a distinguished road
Nothing new here...
__________________
If it's a penny for your thoughts and you always put your two cents worth in, who's getting all these extra pennies?!

The Home Network:
iceBook: 500mhz G3, 384MB RAM, Mac OS X.II.II
B&W Tower: 450mhz G3, 512MB RAM, Mac OS X.II.II
Rev. A iMac: 233mhz G3, 256MB RAM, Mac OS 9.2.2
Mac LC III+: 33mhz 68030, 12MB RAM, NetBSD 1.5.2
Stupid PC: 233mhz Athalon K-6, 80MB RAM, Rhapsody DR2
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old December 12th, 2002, 03:26 PM
kendall's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,089
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
kendall is on a distinguished road
I think a lot of new things have been introduced in this article concerning Marklar. Namely Apple considering releasing an x86 version of OS X along with their PPC offering. Marklar has become more than a last ditch effort to salvage a dying Apple. It stands a chance of become a refuge for PC users fed up with Palladium.

Also, considering Apple may be leveraging the release of Marklar based on Microsoft pulling support for Office on Mac, it would seem Apple has Microsoft between a rock and a hard place.

I think OS X would sell very well on PC hardware. Also, if PC users find they prefer OS X over Windows, chances are their next computer would be a Mac. That is of course if Apple can get their hardware prices more in line with PCs.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old December 14th, 2002, 08:49 AM
celeborn's Avatar
silly elven king
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 154
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
celeborn is on a distinguished road
Apple would also have to make significantly faster hardware for people to even consider buying their stuff. Currently Apple can (and does, to some extent) take advantage of being the only supplier of Macs. Think about it, if OS X worked on all the various cheaper, faster PC hardware out there, would simply having cooler enclosures be enough to stick with Apple hardware?
Apple would have to offer significant benefits of having an Apple-only system.
__________________
Currently Mac-challenged

"God's final message to his Creation: We Apologise For The Inconvenience"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old December 14th, 2002, 11:34 AM
Some guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: England
Posts: 157
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
goynang is on a distinguished road
Same ol' same ol'.....

Whilst such a move would smack of a last throw of the dice on Apple's part I think it's no bad thing to have options. It also gets people talking about Apple which is no bad thing. (All publicity is good publicity etc etc)

I'd be pretty surpised to see it actually happen though!
__________________

PowerMac G5 Dual 2ghz + PowerMac G3 300mhz + iBook 800mhz + 15gb iPod + OS X 10.4.x + Me = Happy
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old December 17th, 2002, 10:36 AM
doemel's Avatar
Mac addict since 1993
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 202
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
doemel is on a distinguished road
Does "Marklar" have anything to do with the friendly people from the planet Marklar in South Park episode 311 (Starvin' Marvin in space)?
__________________
My personal Apple history (italic = dead): * 1993: Centris 610, upg -> PM 6100/60, OC to 80MHz * 1998: iMac [233MHz, 384MB, 10GB] * 2000: PowerBook G3 [233MHz, 384MB, 20GB] * 2003: PowerBook G4 [15", 867MHz, 1GB, 100GB], 10GB 2G iPod * 2004: 20GB 3G iPod, Airport Express * 2006: MBP [15", 2GHz, 2GB, 160GB] * 2007 : MBP C2D [15", 2.33GHz, 3GB, 160GB] * Plus about 15 mostly 2nd hand Macs I bought for my friends and family. About the less Mac centric me.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old December 18th, 2002, 12:51 PM
hazmat's Avatar
Rusher of Din
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,803
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
hazmat is on a distinguished road
Yeah, but with Apple hardware you would get iTools free for life.... oh wait.... :-/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interesting article on 802.11g (aka Airport Extreme) binaryDigit Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 7 May 25th, 2003 11:15 AM
Marklar hazmat Opinions, & Open Letters 13 December 13th, 2002 08:37 AM
ARTICLE: Apple keeps the torch lit with Marklar (x86) MacLuv Opinions, & Open Letters 7 November 26th, 2002 01:07 AM
I am looking for article about IE on Mac designer Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 1 June 7th, 2002 02:17 AM
Yet another newspaper article overlooks Macs simX Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 5 May 31st, 2002 11:50 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11 PM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.