|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ Alra Website Mac Mini (PowerPC) • 256 MB RAM •• iMac (Intel) 20" Mac • OS X Version 10.5.2 • 2.33 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo • 1 GB 667 MHz RAM • ATI Radeon X1600 w/256 MB VRAM • My Book 500 GB• Time Capsule 1 TB • iPhone 16 GB • iPhone 8 GB • iPod Touch 32 GB • iPod Nano 2 GB x 2 Jack Johnson rules! |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| The answer to your question is yes.
__________________ My current machine is an iMac Core 2 Duo 2.16 GHz 24" with MacOS X 10.5.1. My Apples are here. My oldest Apple was born in 1977. Surf my .mac web site. GS/P/>SS d-(++) s+: a+ C+(C) U* P L+ E--- W++ N- o+ K? w O-- M++ V PS+ PE+ Y- PGP t+ 5 X+ R tv-- b+++ DI++ D+ G e+++ h---- r+++ y? Time is not changing, I'm just traveling through time. |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| I am salivating already! I cannot begin to imagine the speed of that monster. Do you think they would increase the bus speed beyond 667MHz? Alra111
__________________ Alra Website Mac Mini (PowerPC) • 256 MB RAM •• iMac (Intel) 20" Mac • OS X Version 10.5.2 • 2.33 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo • 1 GB 667 MHz RAM • ATI Radeon X1600 w/256 MB VRAM • My Book 500 GB• Time Capsule 1 TB • iPhone 16 GB • iPhone 8 GB • iPod Touch 32 GB • iPod Nano 2 GB x 2 Jack Johnson rules! |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| remember that they won't be faster, per se, but that some tasks will be performed in less time, as the load is split, and you will be able to do more stuff at once. the chips i think they would use are not strictly 4 seperate cores, but 2 current 2.3ghz xeons shrunk and put onto one die, so, dual-dual-core, so the 3.0ghz would still beat it at various stuff. and no-one knows what will be announced, apple is always veiled in secrecy. i've found though, that pro stuff is usually speed-bumped around the time of a big announcement, but not actually on the day, possibly the next couple of weeks or something. also, Bus: very likely.
__________________ Dual 1.8GHz G5 2GB, 1TB, Radeon 9600XT 128MB, 10.5 20" Apple Cinema Display + Dell 2005FPW 20" dual-head iBook G3 700MHz 640MB, 40GB, Rage128 16MB, 10.4, dying battery |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| They'd have to increase the bus speed. I think it was arstechnica that already put 2 quad core chips in a MacPro and they couldn't get 100% usage on all 8 cores because of bus speed and memory bandwidth. Those 2 things need to change before the additional cores will be a good idea.
__________________ MacBook Pro 2.16GHz Core2Duo 3GB RAM, G4 1.4GHz OSX Tiger 1.25GB RAM, Dual 2GHz G5 OSX Tiger 2GB RAM (freakin shweet) Athlon 64 Windoze XP for school work (programming) 1GB RAM dferns@macosx.com |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
I am interested in diplaying the following info window for my iMac. Does anyone know how to pull it up? ![]() Thanks, Alra111
__________________ Alra Website Mac Mini (PowerPC) • 256 MB RAM •• iMac (Intel) 20" Mac • OS X Version 10.5.2 • 2.33 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo • 1 GB 667 MHz RAM • ATI Radeon X1600 w/256 MB VRAM • My Book 500 GB• Time Capsule 1 TB • iPhone 16 GB • iPhone 8 GB • iPod Touch 32 GB • iPod Nano 2 GB x 2 Jack Johnson rules! |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| You have to install the developer tools and then you'll have a System Preference pane called Processor.
__________________ MacBook Pro 2.16GHz Core2Duo 3GB RAM, G4 1.4GHz OSX Tiger 1.25GB RAM, Dual 2GHz G5 OSX Tiger 2GB RAM (freakin shweet) Athlon 64 Windoze XP for school work (programming) 1GB RAM dferns@macosx.com |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| Install CHUD Tools (developer package) from your Tiger installation DVD. It's a preference pane. (oh, too slow with posting...) ![]()
__________________ MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4 MacBook 13" 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4 Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4 iPhone 3G 16 GB (v2), AppleTV 1G 40 GB (v2) Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008. |