image
image

|


Go Back   macosx.com > Content & Information > Apple News, Rumors & Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old January 6th, 2007, 12:37 PM
alra111's Avatar
Macaholic
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 205
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
alra111 is on a distinguished road
Wink Macworld Buzz: Will Mac Pros Move To Eight Cores?

Quote:
By Sharon Gaudin
InformationWeek
Fri Jan 5, 4:12 PM ET

Some analysts are predicting that Apple Computer may announce a Mac desktop that sports eight processors at the Macworld Expo next week. Industry watchers say Apple is sure to update its line of desktops and laptops. Will the company go quad-core? Some analysts say it might even work in two quad-core processors to give a Mac desktop the power of eight processors.

ADVERTISEMENT

"I wouldn't be surprised if they start shipping Mac Pros with eight cores," said John Welch, a Unix/open source administrator at Kansas City Life Insurance and a Mac industry analyst who will be speaking at MacWorld Expo 2007. "They could have two quad cores in them. They've got the basic architecture now. They can do this. It would be really cool. You never get in trouble for releasing a faster computer."

Right now, the Mac Pro is running a dual-core Intel Xeon processor. An upgrade could be in the works since Intel is working on quad-core processors.

Bob LeVitus, a tech columnist for the Houston Chronicle and a speaker at MacWorld Expo, also says he wouldn't be surprised if the next generation of the Mac Pro had two quad-core processors.

"It would make sense," says LeVitus, who also is the author of Mac OS X for Dummies. "They've already got the architecture. The chips are designed to go in those sockets. The design is the same." LeVitus, though, says that kind of power most likely would not come cheap. He would expect that kind of horsepower to come with a price tag of $4,000 to $5,000.

He also says there would be a solid market for it. "For the video jockeys and the Photoshop guys and the guys doing big editing jobs, eight processors would be way better than four," he points out.

Richard Shim, a senior research analyst at IDC, expects Apple to enhance its line of notebooks. "The notebooks have been doing very well," he says. "Their notebook shipments hit records in the last quarter. With that kind of momentum, there's an argument to be made to take advantage of it and come up with systems with new screen sizes. There's an appeal for smaller systems, but if I had to make a choice, I'd say bigger is better. I could see them going with a 20-inch notebook."

Welch also thinks there will be additions to Apple's notebook lineup, but he's betting on the company coming up with a smaller machine

LeVitus thinks the MacBook lineup will get speed enhancements, upgraded memory configurations, and possibly a new body design. He also says there's a good chance that Apple will come out with a small notebook, maybe something even in the 10-inch display range and weighing in around 3 pounds.

Shim says these expected upgrades or new machine rollouts could give Apple enough of a boost to push it onto the list of the top three computer manufacturers.

According to Shim and IDC numbers, when it comes to U.S. computer shipments, Apple is right behind Gateway, which sits in the number three spot. Dell is in the lead, with 30.9% of the market. Hewlett-Packard is in the second spot with 21.9%, and Gateway has 5.9%. Apple is nipping at Gateway's heels, though, taking in 5.7% of the market.

"The momentum in their system business is picking up," says Shim. "They have the potential for picking up the No. 3 three spot, and that would be pretty huge for a manufacturer that doesn't have a Windows-based system. This would certainly help them capitalize on the momentum that they have. If they came out with some new notebooks, that would certainly help."
Alra111
__________________
Alra Website
Mac Mini (PowerPC) • 256 MB RAM •• iMac (Intel) 20" Mac • OS X Version 10.5.2 • 2.33 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo • 1 GB 667 MHz RAM • ATI Radeon X1600 w/256 MB VRAM • My Book 500 GB• Time Capsule 1 TB • iPhone 16 GB • iPhone 8 GB • iPod Touch 32 GB • iPod Nano 2 GB x 2
Jack Johnson rules!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old January 6th, 2007, 03:21 PM
chevy's Avatar
Leopardo Da Vinci
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Inside the black box, CH
Posts: 3,812
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
chevy is on a distinguished road
The answer to your question is yes.
__________________
My current machine is an iMac Core 2 Duo 2.16 GHz 24" with MacOS X 10.5.1. My Apples are here. My oldest Apple was born in 1977.
Surf my .mac web site.
GS/P/>SS d-(++) s+: a+ C+(C) U* P L+ E--- W++ N- o+ K? w O-- M++ V PS+
PE+ Y- PGP t+ 5 X+ R tv-- b+++ DI++ D+ G e+++ h---- r+++ y?

Time is not changing, I'm just traveling through time.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old January 6th, 2007, 03:31 PM
alra111's Avatar
Macaholic
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 205
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
alra111 is on a distinguished road
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by chevy View Post
The answer to your question is yes.
I am salivating already!

I cannot begin to imagine the speed of that monster.

Do you think they would increase the bus speed beyond 667MHz?

Alra111
__________________
Alra Website
Mac Mini (PowerPC) • 256 MB RAM •• iMac (Intel) 20" Mac • OS X Version 10.5.2 • 2.33 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo • 1 GB 667 MHz RAM • ATI Radeon X1600 w/256 MB VRAM • My Book 500 GB• Time Capsule 1 TB • iPhone 16 GB • iPhone 8 GB • iPod Touch 32 GB • iPod Nano 2 GB x 2
Jack Johnson rules!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old January 6th, 2007, 04:06 PM
Lt Major Burns's Avatar
"Dicky" Charlteston-Burns
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 3,329
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lt Major Burns will become famous soon enough
remember that they won't be faster, per se, but that some tasks will be performed in less time, as the load is split, and you will be able to do more stuff at once. the chips i think they would use are not strictly 4 seperate cores, but 2 current 2.3ghz xeons shrunk and put onto one die, so, dual-dual-core, so the 3.0ghz would still beat it at various stuff.

and no-one knows what will be announced, apple is always veiled in secrecy. i've found though, that pro stuff is usually speed-bumped around the time of a big announcement, but not actually on the day, possibly the next couple of weeks or something.

also, Bus: very likely.
__________________
Dual 1.8GHz G5 2GB, 1TB, Radeon 9600XT 128MB, 10.5
20" Apple Cinema Display + Dell 2005FPW 20" dual-head
iBook G3 700MHz
640MB, 40GB, Rage128 16MB, 10.4, dying battery
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old January 6th, 2007, 06:55 PM
Captain Code's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,103
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Captain Code will become famous soon enough
They'd have to increase the bus speed. I think it was arstechnica that already put 2 quad core chips in a MacPro and they couldn't get 100% usage on all 8 cores because of bus speed and memory bandwidth. Those 2 things need to change before the additional cores will be a good idea.
__________________
MacBook Pro 2.16GHz Core2Duo 3GB RAM, G4 1.4GHz OSX Tiger 1.25GB RAM, Dual 2GHz G5 OSX Tiger 2GB RAM (freakin shweet)
Athlon 64 Windoze XP for school work (programming) 1GB RAM
dferns@macosx.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old January 7th, 2007, 01:14 PM
alra111's Avatar
Macaholic
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 205
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
alra111 is on a distinguished road
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Code View Post
They'd have to increase the bus speed. I think it was arstechnica that already put 2 quad core chips in a MacPro and they couldn't get 100% usage on all 8 cores because of bus speed and memory bandwidth. Those 2 things need to change before the additional cores will be a good idea.
They mentioned this in an article on TechFreep.

I am interested in diplaying the following info window for my iMac. Does anyone know how to pull it up?


Thanks,
Alra111
__________________
Alra Website
Mac Mini (PowerPC) • 256 MB RAM •• iMac (Intel) 20" Mac • OS X Version 10.5.2 • 2.33 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo • 1 GB 667 MHz RAM • ATI Radeon X1600 w/256 MB VRAM • My Book 500 GB• Time Capsule 1 TB • iPhone 16 GB • iPhone 8 GB • iPod Touch 32 GB • iPod Nano 2 GB x 2
Jack Johnson rules!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old January 7th, 2007, 01:32 PM
Captain Code's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,103
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Captain Code will become famous soon enough
You have to install the developer tools and then you'll have a System Preference pane called Processor.
__________________
MacBook Pro 2.16GHz Core2Duo 3GB RAM, G4 1.4GHz OSX Tiger 1.25GB RAM, Dual 2GHz G5 OSX Tiger 2GB RAM (freakin shweet)
Athlon 64 Windoze XP for school work (programming) 1GB RAM
dferns@macosx.com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old January 7th, 2007, 01:35 PM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 13,043
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
fryke has a spectacular aura aboutfryke has a spectacular aura about
Install CHUD Tools (developer package) from your Tiger installation DVD. It's a preference pane. (oh, too slow with posting...)
__________________
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4
MacBook 13" 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4
Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4
iPhone 3G 16 GB (v2), AppleTV 1G 40 GB (v2)

Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:55 AM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.