|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| http://www.microsoft.com/surface/ um, am I seeing things right, I know microsoft has been planning this for a while, hence the history of the technology, but, seriously, I wanted apple to develop this stuff, so it actually works! (hence the iPhone's capabilities) it pains me that microsoft is doing this.. fear of them spying on everything.., knowing who and what is being "plugged in" to surface.. |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| i'm willing to give microsoft a chance. this is good. they're moving into new directions. innovative directions. ignore their bloated windows and office malarkies, that's just their obligation...
__________________ Dual 1.8GHz G5 2GB, 1TB, Radeon 9600XT 128MB, 10.5 20" Apple Cinema Display + Dell 2005FPW 20" dual-head iBook G3 700MHz 640MB, 40GB, Rage128 16MB, 10.4, dying battery |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| If it's secure enough, and will not be tampered with, then I will give it a chance. After all, the demonstration of paying for different things, and shopping experiences, billing it right to your account, is risky business. They would have to work with all financial institutions worldwide to develop this further. Interesting to see what happens though. |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Makes Microsoft a little more interesting. I wonder what there going to do about finger prints.
__________________ MacBook 2.0 GHz , 250 GB, 2 GB, OS 10.5.4 PowerMac G5 Dual 2.3 GHz, 750 GB, 1 GB, OS 10.5.4 Server |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| I think this "touch-screen" table is a great innovation. Actually I'd love to have one of these at home. Think about all the possibilities of this product! You could organize your photos, watch family videos, write text and print it to your printer... send e-mails etc....
__________________ MacBook / 2 GHz / 1.5 GB RAM / 100 GB HD / Mac OS X.5.4 iBook G4 / 1 GHz / 768 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / Mac OS X.5.4 iMac G3 / 266 MHz / 320 MB RAM / 6 GB HD / Mac OS 9.2.2 Last edited by Ferdinand; June 6th, 2007 at 12:09 AM. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| It's easy to slip into anti-MS rants (especially in this forum ), but this looks very cool. Providing it works the way they advertise, this is a evry useful and innovative technology. Not something we're going to see in our homes IMO, but at restaurants and information booths etc, this would be fantastic. I have 2 fears: 1) it is far away from being released, and is at risk of become vaporware 2) it is going to have some kind of proprietary Touch For Sure® technology which all digital cameras, MP3 players, and others will need to adopt in order to interface with it. If this is going to work -- it needs to be an open standard (or even better, it should work with existing standards). |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| Remember the rumours about a technology of a screen where each pixel is actively a camera? That'd blow _this_ tech away. I guess we haven't heard the first word about things like this.
__________________ MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4 MacBook 13" 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4 Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4 iPhone 3G 16 GB (v2), AppleTV 1G 40 GB (v2) Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008. |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| Not to rain on everyone's parade here with Microsoft's Surface, but it runs Vista under the hood. While that makes me raise an eyebrow, I wonder if this won't be a future feature in later versions of Vista (possibly something that we purposely haven't been able to see from Vista just yet).Definitely something to keep an eye on.
__________________ • Apple iMac G5 17" (2 GHz G5) - Mac OS X 10.4.11 • Apple Macintosh Quadra 650 (33 MHz MC68040) - Mac OS 8.1 • Apple PowerBook Duo 230 (33 MHz MC68030) - System 7.1 • "JHVH-1" (2 GHz AMD Athlon XP 2400+) - Slackware 12.1 • "Kidbuntu" (2.8 GHz Celeron D 335) - Ubuntu 8.04 |