image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Content & Information > Apple News, Rumors & Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old June 9th, 2003, 12:38 AM
Stridder44's Avatar
Universal Traveler
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cali
Posts: 659
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Stridder44 is on a distinguished road
Apple to buy Roxio?

Okay, I know none of you like looprumors , which is understandable, but they say that Apple could possibly buy Roxio.
__________________
http://www.realultimatepower.net/...Are you ready to get pumped!!?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old June 9th, 2003, 01:04 AM
ApeintheShell's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: CO
Posts: 494
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ApeintheShell is on a distinguished road
Don't they own Toast? I wouldn't mind a decent burner application in X.
__________________
1.66 ghz Intel Core Duo Mac Mini w/ Mac OS X 10.5.1,
400 mhz Power PC G3 iMac w/ Mac OS X 10.4.11,iPod Touch 16gb, Maxtor 80gb HD, Lacie 500gb and 250gb HD, 4th-generation 20gb iPod.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old June 9th, 2003, 08:25 AM
Rhino_G3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lyons, KS
Posts: 844
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rhino_G3 is on a distinguished road
Toast is created by roxio, and no they do not own it.
I believe they did buy out a smaller company when they were looking to integrate cd burning into the finder.

If they bought roxio they'd get jam, toast, easy CD creator for the PC as well as many others.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old June 9th, 2003, 10:26 AM
serpicolugnut's Avatar
OS X Supreme Being
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Land of the free, home of the braves
Posts: 1,238
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
serpicolugnut is on a distinguished road
I hope so...

as this would be a purchase of strategic importance to Apple, for a couple of reasons...

1- Roxio makes the best solutions for CD/DVD burning for Windows. Owning the company, Apple could ensure that both the Mac and Windows programs keep feature parity (or even allow the Mac version to feature Mac only features)

2-Napster and Pressplay are Roxio holdings, and competitors to the iTunes Music Store. While neither of the underlying technologies of these services would benefit Apple, as the iTMS has superior backend and technology, Apple could further expand it's user base with bringing the iTMS to these users.

The Register has speculated that the reasons for the acquisition would be to get products to serve as the basis of iLife for Windows. This seems unlikely, since most of iLife is written in Cocoa, and although there are no longer any cross platform Cocoa tools, Apple's engineers from the NeXT days are familiar enough with the technology to make porting these Cocoa apps to Windows easier than recreating them in another framework.

Plus, Apple needs to keep iLife as a Mac only product, as it drives a good bit of the purchasing of new Macs.
__________________
Powerbook G4 17"/1.5ghz/1GB RAM - OS X
iBook 12"/1.2ghz/512MB RAM - OS X
AMD 2200 XP/512MB RAM/WinXP
Visit OS X Factor - OS X News & Resources
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old June 9th, 2003, 02:20 PM
hulkaros's Avatar
The Incredible...
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: MacLand
Posts: 1,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
hulkaros is on a distinguished road
If this rumor will turn to be a fact, I hope that Apple will improve Roxio's products for both platforms (Macs and Wintels) instead of focusing in one platform only...

__________________
I find your lack of faith... Disturbing!

Windows is a 32-bit extension to a 16-bit graphical shell for an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor by a 2-bit company that can't stand 1 bit of competition

...not the sharpest knife in the drawer...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old June 9th, 2003, 02:59 PM
Urbansory's Avatar
The Definition of...
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,180
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Urbansory is on a distinguished road
hopefully i can get this damn burner to work in X before i get a new machine. I doubt it though, it's slow anyway.
__________________
L. Jones
www.urbansory.com

Mac Pro 2.66 ghz - 3 Gig RAM - 10.4.10
G4 400 mhz - 960MB RAM - 10.4.7 & 9.2.1 (Seperate partitions)
Work: Mac Pro 2.66 ghz - 4 Gig RAM - 10.4.-
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old June 9th, 2003, 07:35 PM
Pengu's Avatar
Digital Music Pimp
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Um.. Here.
Posts: 1,591
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Pengu is on a distinguished road
Hey Urbansory, try searching for the model number on xlr8yourmac.com.
I have a Sony CRX-175E, which is apparently "PC only".
However, after the 10.2.6 update, i went to xlr8yourmac.com and got a hacked driver for it, and it works fine in iTunes, havent tried it in the finder.

While it seems silly that apple doesnt support these drives that obviously work, there are always ways around these issues.
__________________
PowerMac G5 Dual 2.0Ghz | 1Gb | 250Gb | Bluetooth | NVidia GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL 256Mb | 20" Cinema Display | MX1000 Wireless Laser Mouse | OS X 10.3.9

PowerMac G4 400Mhz | 832Mb | 40Gb + 120Gb | OS X Server 10.3.8 - Web Dev, Proxy, Mail, NAT, Firewall, Backup

Netgear Gigabit Switch | Sony Ericsson P910i Smartphone | iPod Colour 60Gb
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old June 9th, 2003, 07:41 PM
Stridder44's Avatar
Universal Traveler
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cali
Posts: 659
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Stridder44 is on a distinguished road
Re: I hope so...

Quote:
Originally posted by serpicolugnut
as this would be a purchase of strategic importance to Apple, for a couple of reasons...

1- Roxio makes the best solutions for CD/DVD burning for Windows. Owning the company, Apple could ensure that both the Mac and Windows programs keep feature parity (or even allow the Mac version to feature Mac only features)

2-Napster and Pressplay are Roxio holdings, and competitors to the iTunes Music Store. While neither of the underlying technologies of these services would benefit Apple, as the iTMS has superior backend and technology, Apple could further expand it's user base with bringing the iTMS to these users.

The Register has speculated that the reasons for the acquisition would be to get products to serve as the basis of iLife for Windows. This seems unlikely, since most of iLife is written in Cocoa, and although there are no longer any cross platform Cocoa tools, Apple's engineers from the NeXT days are familiar enough with the technology to make porting these Cocoa apps to Windows easier than recreating them in another framework.

Plus, Apple needs to keep iLife as a Mac only product, as it drives a good bit of the purchasing of new Macs.
I agree with you on this one! It would be a good move on Apple's part.
__________________
http://www.realultimatepower.net/...Are you ready to get pumped!!?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apple- Yesturday, Today, and Tomorrow GroundZeroX Opinions, & Open Letters 19 May 9th, 2005 07:56 PM
InfoWorld Special Report: Apple Unpeeled Michael Watson Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 4 November 24th, 2002 09:22 AM
Future of Apple With x86 pezagent Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 28 August 26th, 2002 12:41 PM
Why doesn't Apple buy Avid and Silicon Graphics? ccuilla Bob's Place 7 January 13th, 2002 06:16 PM
Apple: Forget XP, try the Mac tagliatelle Bob's Place 1 November 25th, 2001 07:12 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:14 AM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.