|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Hi! Is an imac 700 enough for OS/X? or do I need a G4? I currently use Windows 2000 on a PIII 700 and want the same speed. Thanks Roland |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| not comparable Don't compare PIII to G3. Don't compare Windows 2000 to Mac OS X. The speeds you're going to get are gonna vary. File handling will be faster on OS X and the iMac, some applications might be faster on the PIII. RAM is important. You won't really need a G4 right now, but it'd be better. The PowerMacintosh G4 is also more expandable.
__________________ MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 MacBook 13" 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 iPhone 3G 16 GB (v2.1), AppleTV 1G 40 GB (v2.1) Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008. |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| an iMac 700 would be fine for OS X. I use an iBook 500 and X runs like a champ for me. Some of the GUI things will feel a bit slower on the Mac than they are in Windows, but you'll get used to it. The new iMacs are sweet little machines.
__________________ "May all your trails be crooked, winding, lonesome, dangerous, leading to the most amazing view, where something strange and more beautiful and more full of wonder than your deepest dreams waits for you." -Edward Abbey |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Actually.... Any Mac with a G3 processor and a clock speed of around 500 MHz with 256 MB of RAM should run VERY well. Of course, it's better to have later hardware, because of all the other improvements like bus speed and such. However, as was mentioned above, more RAM helps a LOT. And I really mean a LOT. You can get RAM cheap today... one of the best places is www.boundlesstech.com -- good quality, good customer service, good prices. I'm running OS X on an 600 MHz combo drive iBook, and the interface in OS X is actually noticably faster than on my G4 cube 450 MHz, but I think that's probably because I need to erase my hard drive and do a COMPLETE reinstall on my cube. Nevertheless, people have said that OS X runs decently even on a Rev. A iMac, so your 700 MHz iMac will be MORE than sufficient for OS X.
__________________ -- simX Get Memory Usage Getter, the only Mac OS X utility that graphically displays the memory usage of your open processes! http://homepage.mac.com/simx/ 450 MHz G4 Cube | 15" flat-panel Apple Studio Display | 896 MB RAM | Que! Fire 12x10x32x FireWire CD-RW | OS X 10.1.5 Build 5S66 | Mac OS 9.2.2 | Telex M-560 Microphone | Epson Stylus Color 777 | TI-Graph Link USB | Pro Speakers/Mouse/Keyboard | Airport card | iPod "Some people's minds are like cement: all mixed up and permanently set..." -- Andrew Welch, el Presidente, Ambrosia Software, Inc. "You know that first hit of heroin is free." -- Scott McNealy, Sun Microsystem's CEO, on Microsoft's .NET . "The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck is the day they start making vacuum cleaners." -- Unknown |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| You can run OS X on any G3 or G4 computer other than the first Powerbook G3 ![]() |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| G is for G3, is good enough for me "C is for cookie anyone" anyway, I have X.1 running on a rev a iMac with 512 meg of RAM and on my 233 laptop with 160. More Ram helps, max it out if you can. I'd recomend a rev a with 512 over a 500MHz iMac with 128, RAM is that important. oh, and don't expect to do crap with openGL if you are on an iMac. productivity? fine. Quake? or even nanosaur? crap.
__________________ - Beware the wrath of my apathy. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Hi Well the new iMacs should support OpenGL just fine. It is the Rage Pro and lower that aren't very well supported. But otherwise you are correct my friend.
__________________ MacCheetah3 Apple PowerBook G4 Titanium 1GHz, 1GB, 60GB, SuperDrive, Airport, Mac OS X, and 15GB iPod Debug Computer Services http://www.click2debug.com |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wireless network hardware advice needed | uoba | Hardware & Peripherals | 6 | June 10th, 2003 11:52 AM |
| Is Mac hardware really that slow? | bookem | Hardware & Peripherals | 4 | August 20th, 2002 04:12 AM |
| The Positive Reaction Thread | edX | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 29 | August 15th, 2002 08:42 PM |
| New hardware ethernet troubles | scott | Hardware & Peripherals | 1 | September 1st, 2001 06:27 PM |