image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Community > Bob's Place

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old December 29th, 2003, 02:54 PM
UNIX X11's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 299
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
UNIX X11 is on a distinguished road
Question What if Apple had announced it will stop making OSes?

Well, not really, just pretend.
I got this idea from the ResEx poll.
What OS would you use if apple DID stop making OSes? I would use Windows...
Oh, and the reason this isn't a poll, is because I can't find the poll option, and there are too many OSes to list. Heh.

Last edited by evildan; December 31st, 2003 at 10:11 AM. Reason: Misleading title - evildan
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old December 29th, 2003, 03:14 PM
Trip's Avatar
www.TannerSite.com
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,266
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Trip is on a distinguished road
I'd use Mac OS 10.3.

*duh*

__________________
13" MacBook - 2GHz. 2 GB RAM. OS 10.4.7
12" iBook - 500 MHz. 640 MB RAM. (R.I.P.)
TannerSite.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old December 29th, 2003, 03:24 PM
Useless Icon Porter
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Kansas, United States, North America
Posts: 138
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Trillian is on a distinguished road
I'd use some sort of *nix I guess...
__________________
I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old December 29th, 2003, 03:48 PM
RacerX's Avatar
Old Rhapsody User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: US version of Siberia
Posts: 2,553
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
RacerX is on a distinguished road
There are people still using Mac OS 9 three years after Apple stopped development of it (I still have an 8.6 system that I use semi-daily). There are people still using OPENSTEP which Apple stopped developing in 1997 (not counting the Y2K patches put out in 1999 for OPENSTEP 4.2 and NEXTSTEP 3.3). There are still people using Windows NT 4.0 and Windows 98.

Mac OS X v10.3.2 could easily last for years, much like Apple's hardware (I still use a Quadra 950 for burning CDs and doing some page layout and it is more than 10 years old). And I'm still using a 10 year old SGI Indy daily with no dire need of buying a newer system (it is the only hardware I own that can capture full size/full frame rate video without any problems).

I always find it funny that people would stop using something that is discontinued before they would have stopped using it if it hadn't been discontinued. When Adobe discontinued LiveMotion people started making plans to buy Flash. Why? If LiveMotion was good enough before, why stop using it before it has reached the end of it's usefulness.

To the topic at hand, I don't know. It depends on what is out there 5 to 10 years from now. Right now I'm having a hard time justifying upgrading from 10.2 as it does everything I want from an operating system... and I already have a copy of 10.3!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old December 29th, 2003, 04:00 PM
RacerX's Avatar
Old Rhapsody User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: US version of Siberia
Posts: 2,553
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
RacerX is on a distinguished road
It sounds like a question someone would have asked about using a Newton.

What would I do if Apple stopped making Newtons? Would I buy a Palm or Window CE device?

As Apple stopped development of the Newton in 1998, and I'm still using my Newton in 2003/2004 (yes, it connects with my Mac perfectly even through Mac OS X 10.2.6), it tells you how long I can keep advance technology serving me.



Though I am thinking of getting a MessagePad 2100 to replace my MessagePad 120 this next year... it would still be using a Newton!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old December 29th, 2003, 06:59 PM
Arden's Avatar
Don't drink and derive.
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 7,743
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Arden is on a distinguished road
We likes the precious... which in this case is a Tungsten E. Great little PDA.

I would keep on truckin' in whatever my computer was running at the time and write a crapload of nasty letters/emails to Apple asking and complaining about why they're not making OS's anymore.

Oh, and you have to be a "donating member" to make polls.
__________________
System:
2.5 GHz MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo, 4 GB RAM, 200 GB hard drive, runs 10.5.4
1.6 GHz iMac G5, 1.5 GB RAM, 250 GB hard drive, runs 10.4.11
iPhone, 4 GB, OS X 2.0.2

Last edited by JohnnyV; January 1st, 2004 at 01:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old December 30th, 2003, 06:52 PM
MikeXpop's Avatar
iEye
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 356
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
MikeXpop is on a distinguished road
Of course if Apple stopped making OS's I'd be using OS X.3 for years and years.

If all Apple OS's simply dissappeared though, I would use Debian. And Windows for video editing.
__________________
600 iBook, 20g HD, CD-ROM, 640 RAM, running OS X.2.6
5gb iPod
Apple LC ~~RIP~~
Mac Classic
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old December 30th, 2003, 07:47 PM
UNIX X11's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 299
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
UNIX X11 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arden
Oh, and you have to be a "donating member" to make polls.
Stu...
Ok, umm, this isnt going as i planned... so umm, changed.
What if Apple wasnt around? what if they were never here? what if we never had a mac os? what would you use?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:10 AM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.