|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Parallels - need a virtual PC Going to use a virtual PC solution on some of my macs but I have a couple questions I can't find answers to on the company's site. 1) Will this work on most Macs (i.e. newer Intel Macbook, G4 Powerbook, etc.)? I know they're still working on the latest Macbook Pro but don't have one of those. 2) Is Parallels simply a BIOS allowing you to purchase and install the OS you want? 3) Is there a simpler solution than Parallels? Parallel does seem like a pretty simple solution, simpler than Virtual PC which is what I'm currently using on my Powerbook. Thanks for any help. Scott
__________________ 15" Powerbook 1.5 G4 - 2GB ram - DVD R/W - 80GB Drive. Secondary 23" HP display. |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Parallels will only run on intel macs, and only "emulate" intel systems. VirtualPC emulates an intel system on a PowerPC system. Parallels will not work on your PowerBook. Parallels will run windows on top of OS X. Boot Camp, Apple's solution, allows you to install windows as if your mac was a PC.
__________________ Power to Burn. At speeds of up to 733MHz, The most powerful Mac in history burns CDs, burns DVDs, and burns Pentiums - apple website, oct 4, 1999. advertisement for the powermac g4 |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
I am correct in that it's a BIOS setup and I would purchase an XP license and install it onto the Parallel BIOS, right?
__________________ 15" Powerbook 1.5 G4 - 2GB ram - DVD R/W - 80GB Drive. Secondary 23" HP display. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Yes you are correct. You need an XP installation CD, and you'd run Parallels, and then install Windows XP within Parallels. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| hey, it's only more money and i'm sure everyone loves giving it to microsoft........ ![]()
__________________ 15" Powerbook 1.5 G4 - 2GB ram - DVD R/W - 80GB Drive. Secondary 23" HP display. |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| Not correct as it's *NOT* some kind of BIOS. It runs like VirtualPC - only it doesn't have to emulate the processor. Rather, it uses the processor's virtualisation features, so processes are run natively at full speed. However most other devices are simulated. So you won't get full graphics, nor will you get a fullspeed HD (you'll use a disk image, just like VPC on your PPC Macs). A "BIOS" solution... Apple's BootCamp would do something like that. You'd install Windows XP SP2 as a secondary OS on the MacBook. (read about BootCamp, partitioning, driver CD etc. on Apple's site...) The main advantage of BootCamp is that you'll *really* boot into Windows XP SP2, and the OS would have access to the hardware, i.e. graphics would be native as well. The main advantage of Parallels, of course, is that you can run both OSs side by side (or rather Windows within Mac OS X), so you don't have to close all your Mac applications and reboot.
__________________ MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4 MacBook 13" 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4 Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4 iPhone 3G 16 GB (v2), AppleTV 1G 40 GB (v2) Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Using Virtual PC's copy of Windows for Parallels | MDLarson | Boot Camp & OS Virtualization on Mac | 5 | October 31st, 2006 01:49 PM |
| Parallels & OpenGL | spatel783 | Boot Camp & OS Virtualization on Mac | 1 | August 28th, 2006 07:18 PM |
| Parallels vs VMWare | Apokarteron | Boot Camp & OS Virtualization on Mac | 2 | August 21st, 2006 02:32 AM |
| Parallels | irfaan | Mac OS X System & Mac Software | 6 | July 18th, 2006 01:11 PM |
| Parallels Desktop (was Parallels Workstation) review/interview... | fryke | Boot Camp & OS Virtualization on Mac | 2 | July 2nd, 2006 04:50 PM |