image
image

|


Go Back   macosx.com > Mac Help Forums > Hardware & Peripherals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old February 2nd, 2007, 09:50 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 771
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thank The Cheese is on a distinguished road
Playing HD TV on a Mac

I've been saving for a Mac Mini and an EyeTV 500 for a while. Now that I am getting close, I decided to email Elgato to ensure the EyeTV 500 was the right choice. To my surprise, they responded with this:

Quote:
The EyeTV 500 might sound perfect, but we are no longer selling that product and it wouldn't have worked for you, as it's NTSC and not PAL, the system used in Australia.
...
That's a real shame, because I really love my EyeTV 200 and felt the 500 was the prefect solution. I get the feeling digital copy protection is what killed the EyeTV 500.

So now I'm left wondering what my options are. Does anyone know of a good HD TV solution for the Mac? A solution that would allow me to use Australian Digital HDTV signals directly would be nice, but I don't mind buying a separate HDTV set top box if I have to.

Any suggestions appreciated
__________________
Podwatch: Podcast Reviews: Blog | Podcast

iPhone: 8GB, 1.1.3, Unlocked | MacBook Pro: 2Ghz CoreDuo, 2GB RAM, OS X 10.5.2 | Apple TV: 160GB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old February 2nd, 2007, 09:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 771
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thank The Cheese is on a distinguished road
I found the TwinhanDTV Alpha MAC DVB-T, which claims it does HDTV upto 1080i, but it looks a little dodgy. Firstly it spells Mac as though it's an acronym (surely a Mac developer would know better than to call it a "MAC"), and the box art is veeery shifty indeed. Apart from the obvious design flaws, it has a big fat apple logo in the middle, which I'm pretty sure is not sanctioned by Apple.

Anyway, still looking
__________________
Podwatch: Podcast Reviews: Blog | Podcast

iPhone: 8GB, 1.1.3, Unlocked | MacBook Pro: 2Ghz CoreDuo, 2GB RAM, OS X 10.5.2 | Apple TV: 160GB
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old February 3rd, 2007, 03:29 PM
sinclair_tm's Avatar
wow, 1.4g is way faster!
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dusty Mexican Border Lands
Posts: 1,004
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
sinclair_tm is on a distinguished road
well, you stick with elgato and get an eyetv hybrid. i just got one, and its really nice. only draw back is that its software encoding, not hardware. but than i don't think that a mini is the best for hd tv. an imac would be better, but a mac pro would be best. even a g5 would do hd tv better than a mini, imho.
__________________
Digital Audio G4/1.467ghz, 1.5gig ram, 16x Superdrive, 256mb DDR3 AGP 6800GS, zip, 2x500gig raid0 for 1tb on sonnet tempo trio, 10.5.4
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old February 3rd, 2007, 06:27 PM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 13,046
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
fryke has a spectacular aura aboutfryke has a spectacular aura about
i'm not sure why you think a g5 would be better at hdtv... just a feeling?
__________________
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4
MacBook 13" 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4
Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4
iPhone 3G 16 GB (v2), AppleTV 1G 40 GB (v2)

Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old February 3rd, 2007, 09:48 PM
eric2006's Avatar
iMovie Professional
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,194
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
eric2006 is on a distinguished road
bigger hard drive, more memory, better gfx?
__________________
Power to Burn.
At speeds of up to 733MHz,
The most powerful Mac in history
burns CDs, burns DVDs, and
burns Pentiums

- apple website, oct 4, 1999. advertisement for the powermac g4
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old February 3rd, 2007, 11:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 771
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thank The Cheese is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by sinclair_tm View Post
well, you stick with elgato and get an eyetv hybrid. i just got one, and its really nice. only draw back is that its software encoding, not hardware. but than i don't think that a mini is the best for hd tv. an imac would be better, but a mac pro would be best. even a g5 would do hd tv better than a mini, imho.
THe EyeTV hybrid does not support HDTV -- it just upscales standard def (though it does do a good job I must say). It is a great device, i used one for a few days last year, but aside from the portability it doesnt offer me anything my EyeTV 200 does not.
__________________
Podwatch: Podcast Reviews: Blog | Podcast

iPhone: 8GB, 1.1.3, Unlocked | MacBook Pro: 2Ghz CoreDuo, 2GB RAM, OS X 10.5.2 | Apple TV: 160GB
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old February 7th, 2007, 05:53 PM
sinclair_tm's Avatar
wow, 1.4g is way faster!
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dusty Mexican Border Lands
Posts: 1,004
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
sinclair_tm is on a distinguished road
what do you mean doesn't support hdtv? it says right on the webpage i linked:
Quote:
Bonus for Australians: Do you plan to use EyeTV Hybrid with a Dual PowerPC G5 or an Intel Core Duo processor? Then enjoy watching 720p or 1080i HDTV (MPEG-2) in addition to the other digital television standards.
.
i have one and it recieves broadcast hdtv channels that my 250 never sees. i just can't use all the hd features on it because i only have a g4.

as for the g5 vs mini, like eric said, the g5 has the speedier hard drives/interface/beefy vid card and mondo ram that make video editing a breeze.
__________________
Digital Audio G4/1.467ghz, 1.5gig ram, 16x Superdrive, 256mb DDR3 AGP 6800GS, zip, 2x500gig raid0 for 1tb on sonnet tempo trio, 10.5.4
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old February 7th, 2007, 06:12 PM
Satcomer's Avatar
In Geostationary Orbit
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,069
Thanks: 2
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Satcomer is a jewel in the roughSatcomer is a jewel in the roughSatcomer is a jewel in the rough
All I know is with HD movies (legal Quicktime downloads) on my Mac took a lot of processor power (about 135% power on a Dual G5). I then bought a new 23 HD display and those same HD files only took up 35% processor power.

The moral of this story is if you need HD video on your Mac, get a HD display. Your Mac's processor will be thankful if you get a HD display.
__________________
PowerMac G5 Dual 1.8(Rev A.), , 7 Gig RAM, Pioneer DVR-110, ATI X800XT, OS X 10.4.11 & 10.5.4, 23'' HD LCD
Mac Book Pro Core 2 Duo 2.16Mhz, SuperDrive, ATI X1600, 2GB RAM, OS X 10.5.4
Tibook 400Mhz, DVD drive, 1024 RAM, ATI Rage, OS X 10.4.7
1TB Time Capsule
5g iPod 30Gig White
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:59 PM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.