image
image

|


Go Back   macosx.com > Mac Help Forums > Hardware & Peripherals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old June 8th, 2007, 05:01 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 359
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
zoranb is on a distinguished road
new MBPro 17" with HDdisplay

1. Is this really worth the xtra money to order. If so, in what way?
Okay its the MBPro 17" but why order it with the HDef display and not the 1680x1050? Will the HD display only work for watching a movie or for OSX too?
2. Should i also wait for the 17" with led display to appear later on or not? Or can we say that the difference led/lcd isnt that big worth to wait for it for another 3-6months?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old June 8th, 2007, 08:26 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 2,485
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
MisterMe will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoranb View Post
1. Is this really worth the xtra money to order. If so, in what way?
Okay its the MBPro 17" but why order it with the HDef display and not the 1680x1050? Will the HD display only work for watching a movie or for OSX too?
...
Neither 17" MacBook Pro display meets the legal definition of high-definition because their aspect ratios are 16:10 rather than the standard of 16:9. However, both exceed the number of pixels required to show high-def. The 1680x1050 can display every pixel of a 720p high-def video within a window. The optional 1920x1200 display can show every pixel of a 1080p video with space left over. If movies are the deciding factor, then you will be hard-pressed to see the difference on a monitor as small as a 17" MacBook display.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old June 8th, 2007, 08:30 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 359
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
zoranb is on a distinguished road
if movies arent a deciding factor should i go for ordering the MBPro with the HD resolution or not? Why not?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old June 8th, 2007, 10:41 AM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 13,029
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
fryke has a spectacular aura aboutfryke has a spectacular aura about
Price? I haven't checked how much more it costs, but I guess it's a difference. The higher resolution screen simply shows you more. On the other hand, it shows you everything _smaller_. (That problem will be countered with Leopard's resolution-independence, though, when you buy that in October or so.)

Generally, think of it this way: If you're out to buy a really _highend_ notebook now, you'll want it to be top-notch for at least a year. You want it to be good in two years. Display resolution will increase in coming years. Even if you think it won't increase that _much_ until 2010, you still have to agree that display resolutions for notebooks basically never went _down_.

I'd go for the 1920 one. But I'd try both in a store somewhere. Right now, you can't increase the size of, say, the menubar etc. in OS X, so it _will_ be smaller on the high-res model. (Again: Only until you get Leopard, which lets you choose these things.)
__________________
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4
MacBook 13" 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4
Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4
iPhone 3G 16 GB (v2), AppleTV 1G 40 GB (v2)

Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old June 8th, 2007, 10:55 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 359
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
zoranb is on a distinguished road
intresting info fryke thanx, perhaps somebody that owns a 17" can make us a screen capture to see what we are really talking about!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old June 8th, 2007, 11:51 AM
chevy's Avatar
Leopardo Da Vinci
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Inside the black box, CH
Posts: 3,809
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
chevy is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoranb View Post
intresting info fryke thanx, perhaps somebody that owns a 17" can make us a screen capture to see what we are really talking about!
It may be difficult to see i on a screen capture.... the screen capture will be identical to a 24" iMac !
__________________
My current machine is an iMac Core 2 Duo 2.16 GHz 24" with MacOS X 10.5.1. My Apples are here. My oldest Apple was born in 1977.
Surf my .mac web site.
GS/P/>SS d-(++) s+: a+ C+(C) U* P L+ E--- W++ N- o+ K? w O-- M++ V PS+
PE+ Y- PGP t+ 5 X+ R tv-- b+++ DI++ D+ G e+++ h---- r+++ y?

Time is not changing, I'm just traveling through time.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old June 8th, 2007, 12:47 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 359
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
zoranb is on a distinguished road
well can i have a look at a screen capture of a 24" imac?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old June 8th, 2007, 03:52 PM
ScottW's Avatar
Founder
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 3,164
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
ScottW is on a distinguished road
I have a 17" Powerbook with the 1680 resolution, I also have a 24" monitor with the 1920 resolution.

While I would love to have the real-estate of the 1920 resolution on my Powerbook, it is simply going to be too small. I'd prefer higher resolutions on smaller displays and was terribly happy to see the 1680 on the 17" PB, vs the standard 1440 that is typically associated with 17" wide-screens.

The ONLY advantage, outside of pure 1080 HD selection, is if you typically use a 24" display, and had to disconnect and become mobile, your resolution, your window location, everything would be the same. That is attractive to me personally, but I can't imagine the reduction in screen size that would be. In fact, I'm going to take a screen shot and try it out.

Okay... I took a screen shot of my 24" display... went into photoshop and reduced it to about the size of a 17" display, then I placed it on top of the original screen size, to give you an idea... since looking at it in other resolutions, would not give you the full effect. This allows you to compare the same resolution against each other.
Attached Images
File Type: png Picture 5.png (946.5 KB, 10 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:26 AM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.