image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Mac Help Forums > Mac OS X System & Mac Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old May 25th, 2002, 08:00 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
FrankH is on a distinguished road
Setting up OS X

Hi everyone,

I just completly reinstalled OS X with an additional 512 MB modul (I now have 704 MB on my machine) and HPS+ instead of UFS.

Well, I must say, it is damn fast !!!
I just couldn't believe it. Even after the installation of 10.0 I was impressed because it was so much faster than before (I mean, 10.1. with 192 MB of RAM), but after 10.1. I thought "wow, that can't be ..."

Now I did all the necessary software updates and my system seems to run stable and multi-tasking performs perfectly (never saw a system that was able to handle it that good).

BTW, I had some difficulties in installing OS X. After I updated to 10.1.3 (it left out 10.1.2, I don't know why) and wanted to restart OS X wasn't able to do so because mail.app didn't quit (this problem remained). Then I tried to do it manually by "shooting" it up, but this wasn't successful. In the end I had to turn my Mac off and boot because OS X did some very interesting things (like launching the Finder several times). Fortunately, Disk repair was able to repair my OS X volume after restart (it recognized an invalid BTree Header, some minor problems and problems with the bit map).
I guess that HFS+ is a bit bug-sensitiv, on my older system configuration where I had UFS installed, I never noticed such things. Problems only accured with HFS+. (but UFS isn't the best choiche either, for it is quite slow)
Has anyone experienced similiar things while the installation?

Nevertheless, OS X really runs fine. I am planning to use it for software development and this is really something you can work with!

Frank
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old May 25th, 2002, 10:59 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New York City, NY
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
EmpireCityRay is on a distinguished road
Re: Setting up OS X

Quote:
Originally posted by FrankH
[b]...BTW, I had some difficulties in installing OS X. After I updated to 10.1.3 (it left out 10.1.2, I don't know why)...
Because when you used either Software up date or the manual update of 10.1.3 you (or the Software Update) used the combo package which bypasses installation of X 10.1.2 in hopes os reaching 10.1.3, though you should have used the combo package to 10.1.4 but well you must have wanted 10.1.3 (to each their own)

As for drive set ups, UFS for a Mac OS X never was recommended
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old May 25th, 2002, 02:33 PM
hew's Avatar
hew hew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 38
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
hew is on a distinguished road
I don't believe they have combo 10.1.4 yet.. I may be wrong, but I've never seen it in Software Update yet.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problems setting up proftpd server balence81 Mac OS X System & Mac Software 3 February 20th, 2003 11:27 PM
What are the setting for a Slave 60gig hardrive petros2929 Hardware & Peripherals 0 December 23rd, 2001 08:57 PM
Can't change generic "Open with" setting genecutl Mac OS X System & Mac Software 2 December 22nd, 2001 11:10 AM
Monitor Resolution setting? boysimple Mac OS X System & Mac Software 5 December 21st, 2001 03:34 AM
How to disable IE from changing my internet setting? PoweMACuser Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 1 November 8th, 2001 11:15 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49 PM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.