|
#1
| |||
| |||
| My IT Dept wont give us a burn applic so we have to use the OS to archive onto cd/dvd. Why does the OS take so much room to do its voodoo. On a cd of 700 MB there is only 640 MB available and on a DVD only 4.27 GB of 4.7 GB is burnable. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Hey Bauer Which version of osx are you using because this doesnt seem to be the case for me? I just burnt a 694 MB file via finder in 10.4.4 and ive never had any problems getting the maximum capacity of a dvdr |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Same here - no issue with the OS 10.4.4 burn or with Toast 7... which application did they give you?
__________________ In the end - dirt wins. |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Technically, 700MB CD-Rs are a "hack." They use sections of the disk that the standard dictates they really shouldn't to try and fit more data on the CD, and are usually referred to as "non-standard": Quote:
I have found that OS X sometimes does not recognize 700MB CD-Rs and instead reports them as 640MB CD-Rs. Would it be possible to simply compress a few files, then burn the CD, to get it under the 640MB limit?
__________________ Power Macintosh G4/500MHz "Yikes!" 10.4.11 Server • 1024MB • 3 x 120GB + 320GB • DVR-111D • 2 x Radeon 7000 PCI • 2 x 17" CRT MacBook 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo - White 10.5.5 • 2048MB • 80GB • CD-RW/DVD-ROM iPod Photo 60GB • iPod nano 1GB • AT&T DSL 6Mb/768k http://www.jeffhoppe.com |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| If the OS reads 640, that is all you will get. If the OS doesn't read beyound that limit - you cannot fudge that without an OS hack or something similar. We are talking about less than 1% of a CD.
__________________ In the end - dirt wins. |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| Heh... technically, more like 8.5% (640/700 = ~0.914 = ~91.5%)... Just being a little anal today! ![]()
__________________ Power Macintosh G4/500MHz "Yikes!" 10.4.11 Server • 1024MB • 3 x 120GB + 320GB • DVR-111D • 2 x Radeon 7000 PCI • 2 x 17" CRT MacBook 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo - White 10.5.5 • 2048MB • 80GB • CD-RW/DVD-ROM iPod Photo 60GB • iPod nano 1GB • AT&T DSL 6Mb/768k http://www.jeffhoppe.com |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| There are a few issues at play, here. As others have said, sometimes the Finder won't acknowledge the full size of a CD. I just don't use the Finder to burn CDs if I can avoid it. I use Toast, or YuBurner (free), or Firestarter FX (also free). None of them have ever given me problems, and they all let me fill every bit of that 702.8MB. If you have sufficient privileges, try downloading one of those apps. The issue with CDs and DVDs is a little different, though. DVDs do not hold 4.7GB of data! At least not by software standards. The confusion comes from the two different definitions of KB/MB/GB. In hard drive sizes, "GB" almost always means "one billion bytes" (decimal counting). But all software defines a GB as 2^30 bytes (binary counting; that's 1,073,741,820). CDs are measured using binary counting. DVDs are not, for some annoying reason. Therefore, a DVD's "4.7GB" = 4,700,000,000 bytes = 4.377 GB by software standards. Another factor to consider is formatting size. The invisible HFS+ database files can be quite large on volumes with many files. I don't think that could account for the ~100MB of missing space you're getting on your DVD, though. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lexmark X73 eats a lot of CPU | chevy | Hardware & Peripherals | 0 | October 30th, 2005 04:20 AM |
| Disk Capacity | wwsc_proj | Mac OS X Server | 6 | September 29th, 2005 02:06 AM |
| OSX eats a lot of space | scng | Mac OS X System & Mac Software | 2 | July 12th, 2005 12:08 AM |
| Tiger eats 100% CPU | brendan | Mac OS X System & Mac Software | 28 | May 17th, 2005 05:00 PM |
| Higher capacity DVD-R's ... | bjurusik | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 21 | December 31st, 2003 01:51 PM |