image
image

|


Go Back   macosx.com > Mac Help Forums > Mac OS X System & Mac Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old April 7th, 2001, 08:43 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 24
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
maxebb is on a distinguished road
Red face

Just a little note to those who think they can use Adobe applications with OSX, think again! Just wait for them to go native X cause right now they crash hard. Although it's fun to force quit them without crashing OSX.

max.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old April 7th, 2001, 11:21 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 124
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
plaidpjs is on a distinguished road
Not quite the truth...

maxebb,

I'm sure documenting your experience with the apps would just be asking too much, so let me relate my experinece with Adbe products on OS X.

PhotoShop (6.01) - It opens fast and actually runs faster. I have had no problems running it in Classic, up to and including using large Action scripts and batch processing 20 to 30 files.

Illustartor (9.0.2) - Once again no problems to date, and the speed under Classic does appear faster (I haven't benchmarked this with anything like I have in PhotoShop).

GoLive (5.0) - The only Adobe product I've had problems running in Classic. And, actually the only problem I've had is the one Adobe documented, when using the click and shoot functions the arrow does not render in the OS X screen space. To avoid any complications I just boot into 9.1 when I want to work in GoLive.

Acrobat (4.05a) - Has given me no problems, but I have noticed a slight lag in creating the actual PDFs. Not sure where that comes from, but it is not unusable.

ATM (4.6.1) - It has worked just as it should in 9.1. I haven't determined whether it really matters in OS X, but then again there isn't a whole hell of a lot detailing how OS X handles Fonts, besides to say it recognizes quite a fe different ones and you can make them active by just sticking them in the Fonts folder and relogging.

I'd be curious to know how things like After Effects and Premiere have worked in Classic. But, there's my experience, at least.

Ciao
__________________
Primary Machine:
----------------------------
G4/500 Dual Processor
768 MB RAM
32MB ATI Radeon OEM Video Card
40GB Internal HDD
30GB Firewire HDD
Que 12x10x32 Firewire CD-RW
Epson Express. 1200 Firewire Scanner
Apple Cinema Display
Palm V w/Keyspan USB-Serial Adaptor
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old April 7th, 2001, 12:01 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: California
Posts: 152
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hobeaux is on a distinguished road
Adobe Apps Do Suck in Classic

The only two Adobe apps that i've used in Classic have been Photoshop 6 and Illustrator 9, and the experience has not been good.

For the most part, photoshop behaves as it should but I've noticed these issues (that I can remember off the top of my head):
  • if photoshop isn't already launched, double-clicking on a file will launch photoshop; but a side affect is that the menubar may not load with photoshop. if you can remember your keystroke shortcuts you can still Save, Save As, etc but you won't be able to navigate to them.
  • the Open Dialog box doesn't show previews correctly, and can vary between no previews to partially drawn ones. on rare occasions will actually draw them completely.
  • the worst: photoshop can actually bring X to its knees. five times within the past two weeks i've suffered hard-crashes where restarting the machine was the only option. a Classic app is not supposed to do that, but there you go.

I don't recall my experience with Illustrator, it must have been uneventful.

for the record, I started with 256MB on the system (with 20, 40, 80MB applied to photoshop) then canabalized another mac to upgrade it to 512MB (applied 256MB to photoshop). the result is the same, it works most of the time, but when it crashes -- lookout.

save often.
__________________
Hobeaux
(website offline)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old April 7th, 2001, 01:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 124
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
plaidpjs is on a distinguished road
Re: Adobe Apps Do Suck in Classic

Quote:
Originally posted by Hobeaux
for the record, I started with 256MB on the system (with 20, 40, 80MB applied to photoshop) then canabalized another mac to upgrade it to 512MB (applied 256MB to photoshop). the result is the same, it works most of the time, but when it crashes -- lookout.
This might actually be your problem with crashing the system. There have been a lot of problems regarding 3rd party RAM. If you search the boards you'll find out more on it. I haven't really read through most of the stuff on it as I haven't had crashes or kernel panics to speak of outside of IE 5.1 on the very first day OS X was installed. I am also going on 9 days without shutting down.

The uptime wars have begun. LOL!

Sorry your experience has been bad, but mine has not, about the only issue I can concur with you on is the menu bar, but I have found it to be relatively simple to pay attention to the load state of the app before I double click a related file.
__________________
Primary Machine:
----------------------------
G4/500 Dual Processor
768 MB RAM
32MB ATI Radeon OEM Video Card
40GB Internal HDD
30GB Firewire HDD
Que 12x10x32 Firewire CD-RW
Epson Express. 1200 Firewire Scanner
Apple Cinema Display
Palm V w/Keyspan USB-Serial Adaptor
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old April 8th, 2001, 04:18 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 24
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
maxebb is on a distinguished road
Adobe, problems, enough to make me switch.

Okay, I'll come clean with what I've experienced with Adobe. It may not seem like much but it was big enough of a deal to me because it affects the way I work dramatically.


Illustrator: A sure way to crash Illustrator 9 in OSX. Select a group or object on the page. Mix a color in the color palette, then drag that color to the Swatch pallet.. in mid drag illustrator freezes.. you need to force quite. I can recreate this freeze time and time again. Ill9 works great in OS 9.1 no problems.


Photoshop: The fonts were my main beef here. They were being extra animalized resulting in a rough looking fonts. Not too bad, but enough to piss me off and go back to 9.1


See, told you it wasn't much but it was enough to make me stop pussyfooting around with Adobe in OSX.


I'm just wondering now, I hope someone at Adobe is reading this.. I'd hate to waste all this fine bitching.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old April 8th, 2001, 09:16 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 124
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
plaidpjs is on a distinguished road
Adobe is listening...

Okay, so really, they aren't paying attention to these boards at all. But, Adobe has said they will be supporting OS X in the next release of all their flagship products. The question, however, is, when will those "next" versions be coming? Acrobat 5.0 was released after OS X and it has no native support for the platform. PhotoShop Elements is being released, and it has no native support for OS X. Hmmmm????

Well, as per the norm, Adobe is being tight lipped about anything as far as release dates are concerned. And, there is hide nor hair to be found of anything regarding betas.... but, then again, that isn't unusual for Adobe either.

I'll make a wild prediction and say that they debut all new COCOA versions of their apps at MWNY... that would be too sweet!
__________________
Primary Machine:
----------------------------
G4/500 Dual Processor
768 MB RAM
32MB ATI Radeon OEM Video Card
40GB Internal HDD
30GB Firewire HDD
Que 12x10x32 Firewire CD-RW
Epson Express. 1200 Firewire Scanner
Apple Cinema Display
Palm V w/Keyspan USB-Serial Adaptor
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old April 8th, 2001, 10:38 PM
aH-NAH :: GHASAD-Ha
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Disneyland
Posts: 56
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
glowurm@mac.com is on a distinguished road
Post Official Adobe statement

Go here:

http://www.adobe.com:82/products/adobesupportsOSX.html

Answers questions, No?

__________________
- °g£øwµ®m™

:: THERBIS BAEWOTNEM OCERGELIS AEDERPHOP RONDERHASM ::
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old April 9th, 2001, 04:45 AM
strobe's Avatar
Puny Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 795
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
strobe is on a distinguished road
I used Photoshop 5.5 without a problem.

By the way Darwin's VM will be faster than Adobe's so you may try increasing the heap size so Photoshop dosn't use their custom scratch disk.

I too am very dissapointed with Adobe. I don't use Illutrator though, I hate it. I use Canvas 7. Canvas 8 will RULE! Deneba will be ripping out all the QuickDraw code and using PDF. Smell the superior sub-pixel graphics!
__________________
---
>80 column hard wrapped e-mail is not a sign of intelligent
>life
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mac OSX printing problems with Photoshop, Quark and Adobe Distiller keef Mac OS X System & Mac Software 3 May 4th, 2006 03:54 PM
OSX and OS9.2 apps. compatibility? fongster Mac OS X System & Mac Software 2 November 14th, 2003 09:10 AM
How to edit sound resources in OSX apps? MLJ_osxcom Mac OS X System & Mac Software 0 May 31st, 2002 08:52 AM
Thoughts about UNIX apps on OSX? mczolton Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 1 October 19th, 2000 02:06 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:06 AM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.