image
image

|


Go Back   macosx.com > Mac Help Forums > Mac OS X System & Mac Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old May 12th, 2007, 02:20 PM
robins
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 117
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
RobinS is on a distinguished road
Raid 0 on PPC Mac Mini

I use an adaptor to run a full size 7200 rpm IDE hard drive in my 1.25 ghz Mini. It converts the notebook plug to a regular size IDE plug. I have a spare channel on the IDE cable of course which I usually use for a full size DVD burner.

I heard that there was a comparison using an Xserve between Raid 0 using a hardware controller and the software version built into OS X. Apparently the software version was only about 5-10% slower. This got me thinking.....

Why not use 2 IDE drives on my IDE cable in Raid 0? I have another 250 gb drive here that I use for backup (that could work with my existing 250 gb), so as soon as I pick up a 3rd for my backup I'll be set. I was cloning my hard drive so I needed the same size as my working drive which is almost full all the time, but now I realize that it would be better to reinstall the OS if I have a hard drive problem (they do seem to accumulate over time just like Windows) so I won't need as large a hard drive for backup as before.

Can you see any problems with this idea?
Would it run noticeably faster?
Its particularly attractive because I was going to get a larger hard drive anyway. Now I just have to buy the backup and I'll have twice the space. And an external USB2 or Firewire case for the DVD burner of course. Do you think it makes any difference between USB2 and Firewire? Will USB2 be slower in any way if I'm just reading and writing DVD's?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old May 16th, 2007, 12:55 AM
Cantankerous misfit
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 64
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Decade is on a distinguished road
Yes, I see a problem.

If I remember correctly, the drivers and drives for parallel ATA don't allow the drives to be both doing stuff at the same time, which pretty much negates the speed advantage of RAID-0. Maybe if the drives' on-disk cache is large enough for your work and have write-back caching (an unsafe technique), then it might work for you, but I doubt that that's the case.

Serial ATA gets around that problem by not allowing more than 1 drive per channel. SCSI gets around that problem by allowing drives to disconnect/reconnect on the bus. I'm not sure about Firewire. I'm reasonably sure that USB doesn't allow disconnected operation.

Firewire is supposed to take less CPU time than USB, leaving more time for tasks like managing the cache and readahead buffer.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old May 16th, 2007, 01:39 PM
Captain Code's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,102
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Captain Code will become famous soon enough
I don't think you can boot off of an OS X software RAID. I haven't even found one that can boot via hardware RAID cards. The only thing I think would work is the external Firewire RAID 0 enclosures.
__________________
MacBook Pro 2.16GHz Core2Duo 3GB RAM, G4 1.4GHz OSX Tiger 1.25GB RAM, Dual 2GHz G5 OSX Tiger 2GB RAM (freakin shweet)
Athlon 64 Windoze XP for school work (programming) 1GB RAM
dferns@macosx.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:44 PM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.