image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Mac Help Forums > Mac OS X System & Mac Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old January 12th, 2005, 10:18 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
samfrog88 is on a distinguished road
Why make the jump to Mac?

I'm a native PC user and throughout the years I have loved and hated Windows. I'm not going to lie, I love XP. I guess you could say I am into more of the technical aspect of computers, so OS X appeals to me. Over the past year I have started to get into linux, and linux has issues of its own. My question is, "Why switch to OS X?" The reason I am seriously considering switching now is Macintosh finally got an OS right. OS classic might just be the shame of the computing industry. I use it (OS X) casually at school sometimes. From what I read, OS X users are parading its reliability around. From what I've experienced, it is quite reliable, but then again, so is my pc. When I boot up my PC I usually don't worry about it crashing and losing my data, simply because with a little work, many of these problems can be avoided. I am not considering making the switch completely, but considering a Mac for a main work machine. I do a lot of web design, video editing, and image editing (Photoshop). My pc is not a cheap box, and I have not had hardly any problems with it. Besides the beauty of OS X (and its unix base, which intrigues me, and its stability) I would like to know what reasons, if any, are there left for me to switch.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old January 12th, 2005, 11:08 AM
ElDiabloConCaca's Avatar
U.S.D.A. Prime
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 10,287
Thanks: 3
Thanked 109 Times in 101 Posts
ElDiabloConCaca is a jewel in the roughElDiabloConCaca is a jewel in the roughElDiabloConCaca is a jewel in the rough
Because it's cheaper than ever now:

http://www.apple.com/macmini/

While I wouldn't use that computer for any heavy image editing or heavy video cutting, it should handle medium-weight work quite well. I design websites on an old G4/500MHz machine -- and from my experience, the speed and quality of development doesn't come from the speed or power of the machine; rather, from your abilities and skills.
__________________
Power Macintosh G4/500MHz "Yikes!" 10.4.11 Server • 1024MB • 3 x 120GB + 320GB • DVR-111D • 2 x Radeon 7000 PCI • 2 x 17" CRT
MacBook 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo - White 10.5.5 • 2048MB • 80GB • CD-RW/DVD-ROM
iPod Photo 60GB • iPod nano 1GB • AT&T DSL 6Mb/768k
http://www.jeffhoppe.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old January 12th, 2005, 11:55 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NW and SE England
Posts: 514
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
mw84 is on a distinguished road
I'm not ging to pretend I know a lot about computers or various OS but I recently changed completely from a PC running Windows and Linux Redhat 9 to my Mac and I couldn't recommend it highly enough to anyone.

It has a lot of the things I loved about Linux like the stability, security and the mass of FREE, quality, open source software available to you, yet I can still do all of the things I had to rely on Windows to do when I was using Linux, mainly gaming, all without the hassle of dual booting. It's all so easy to grasp too, I found myself ripping out hair trying to get to grips with Linux but os x is super user friendly.

Aside from that the visual appeal alone for me is massive, it has to be the best looking operating system I've ever used along with the hardware. All the Apple systems and other products look great. My new mac has become a decorative feature

Get one !
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old January 12th, 2005, 12:10 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 269
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Jeffo is on a distinguished road
if you are a serious web designer you should already have a mac so that you can test your stuff on more then just windows. to be complete you should also have a linux box kicking around too for testing. that macmini that was previously mentioned would be a great way to get your foot in the door. with the mac mini you could even partition the one drive and put OS X and yellowdog or something like that on it. and to take it one step further, if you did not want to get a second monitor for cost/space reasons you could probibly get a kvm box or something to use both machines with the same monitor.
__________________
--Jeffo--

My Machines

Team_Ozzieburn (41990) for Folding@Home
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old January 12th, 2005, 12:42 PM
quiksan's Avatar
awesomer...
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Strongbadia (Denver, CO)
Posts: 539
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
quiksan is on a distinguished road
everyone else has made good points that I'd have made also.

couple other things to keep in mind:
OS X is unix based, but with a sick GUI over top. So whether you're a power or a new user, you can get along with it simply, or get into the guts under the hood with the terminal and bash shell. either way you go, it just works.

A nice dual environment. While the KVM switch would work, you could also use MS's Remote Desktop Connection on OS X, to connect to your pc (running in a closet, or wherever) over your network, and run it in a terminal services style window, WHILE having immediate access to everything OS X.

Since it doesn't sound like you'll drop the pc for the mac completely (I thought the same thing a couple years back...I was wrong), most software vendors (like adobe, macromedia, etc) usually let you trade your windows license of software in for the os x version. worth a look at least.

As was also mentioned, the open source and freeware available on os x is awesome. there are so many great free and nearly free shareware apps out there. It boggles the mind. 43folders.com has a great listing of peoples' favorite little apps for OS X. will take you hours to peruse them and find what you like best. there's so much out there, and so much of it is just so useful, beautiful, and simple. great stuff.



It's not so much that you can do things on a mac that you can't do on a windows pc. The thing is, you can do it EASIER and BETTER on a mac. That's my feeling as a somewhat recent switcher. Ther are some things (based on the open source software and apple software) that I can do on OS X that I can't on a PC, but mostly it's just that it's so much easier, and the end product is that much more satisfying when you've used a fraction of the effort/time, and gotten twice the results.

the mac mini is a great way to try it out for a very minimal investment. probably a great place to start IMO.
__________________
17" of PowerBook love...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old January 12th, 2005, 12:50 PM
Zammy-Sam's Avatar
Desertchild
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 6,658
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Zammy-Sam is on a distinguished road
I am a "quite" fresh switcher. I was also used to all windows versions and fell in love with the ibook. Now I simply love the operating system and the harmony between hardware and software. I saw so many ppl switching and not even one regretted this step.
__________________
iBook 600; 12''; 640mb; 8mb Rage; DVD-CDRW-Combo, 20GB
P4 1.6; 2x80GB Raid1 (file-server)
tiBook 1Ghz, Superdrive, 768MB, 64mb 9000, 60GB
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old January 12th, 2005, 03:52 PM
nixgeek's Avatar
Mac of the SubGenius! :-)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 7,688
Thanks: 17
Thanked 95 Times in 79 Posts
nixgeek has a spectacular aura aboutnixgeek has a spectacular aura aboutnixgeek has a spectacular aura about
After watching the Macworld keybote, I think that would be reason enough to switch over to the Mac. No virus issues / spyware issues also, but I think that everything that was introdeced at Macworld this week is enough to get anyone to switch. I still to this day have not seen anything on the PC world, be it Windows or Linux, that can do what Apple's offerings can. Nuff said.
__________________
Apple iMac G5 17" (2 GHz G5) - Mac OS X 10.4.11
Apple Macintosh Quadra 650 (33 MHz MC68040) - Mac OS 8.1
Apple PowerBook Duo 230 (33 MHz MC68030) - System 7.1
"JHVH-1" (2 GHz AMD Athlon XP 2400+) - Slackware 12.1
"Kidbuntu" (2.8 GHz Celeron D 335) - Ubuntu 8.04
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old January 12th, 2005, 04:30 PM
symphonix's Avatar
Scratch & Sniff Committee
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The Australian Jungles
Posts: 4,024
Thanks: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
symphonix is on a distinguished road
Simple:
- Efficient user interface. Do with 1 click things that take 5 clicks in Windows, like ejecting a Flash memory key.
- Better software. Better management of movies, digital photos, and so on.
- Lots of high-end software exclusive to the Mac (Logic, Final Cut, Motion).
- Stability to run multiple high end applications continually, without need to reboot, ever.
- Not a single virus issue on Macintosh for over 10 years.
- No need to maintain the computer's software. Forget adware, spyware, disk fragmentation, vulnerability to hackers, mismatched DLLs, or hunting down drivers for your printer or CD drive.
- Better build quality.
- One supplier, one warranty.
- All components and accessories (digital cameras, printers, anything) work natively, without ever needing to load a driver.
- A software update process that actually works.
- A system that allows a crashed application (and it can happen, especially with beta stuff) to be closed without causing any disruption to other apps.
- Lots of features and software "out-of-the-box" that are expensive and poorly written extras or shareware addons for Windows, such as FTP/Web servers, Java, development tools, compilers & programming environments, and so on.
- BlueTooth support that works consistently well.
- iPhoto. A great way to handle all your digital photos effectively, regardless of what camera you're using and so on. If you buy an Olympus camera for instance and plug it into a PC, you have to load up Olympus software. If you later change to a different brand, then those thousands of photos are in the wrong program! If your camera turns out not to be supported in Longhorn for 6 months after its release, do you think anyone will be able to help you?

What sums it up best is that since I've had a Mac, I've always been able to do the latest and greatest things and never have to worry about whether this printer or that camera is supported. When Tiger comes out, I can confidently install it and not have to worry about whether my Wacom tablet or my SonyErriccsson phone will work: they WILL.
When Longhorn comes out two years after Tiger, minus a lot of the features they'd promised (they've already scrapped WinFS, their own answer to Spotlight), can any PC user honestly tell me that it'll install flawlessly and all of their hardware and software will continue to work flawlessly? Or will all those people who rush out to buy Longhorn be telling me "Wow! Longhorn is GREAT ... but my mobile phone no longer transfers contacts with Outlook, but the new drivers are just around the corner!"

Finally, I'd have to rate Apple's attention to detail as being without parallel. On the first release of 10.2, the address format for Australian addresses in Address Book had the postcode incorrectly placed before the town/suburb. A week later, the first update was released and this was one of the several hundred minor fixes. I've never seen a serious problem with Apple software, only a handful of minor quirks like that, all of which are corrected very promptly.
__________________
- iMac G5 1.8GHZ 17" | SuperDrive | 160GB | 512MB | Airport Extreme | Bluetooth Keyboard & Mouse | Wacom Intuos II
- Pentax *ist DL - JVC MiniDV Camcorder - Airport Express - iPod Nano 1gb white
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 AM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.