|
#1
| |||
| |||
| What's so great about macs? Why are they better than PCs? Isn't more software compatible with PCs? Such as though free song software, Monopoly and such? Why does everyone favor macs? What am I missing! |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Ahem..Monopoly and free song software? Are you serious?
__________________ Kildare G.A.A. Offaly used 6 subs |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Because Monopoly and "free song software" (whatever the hell that is) are the two defining factors between a "good" computer and a "bad" computer. Right. If you'd like to see what's so much better about Macs, head on down to your local Apple Store or authorized Apple reseller and try one out for yourself. You may find it better, you may not like it at all -- just be open-minded when you try it and don't expect it to work like Windows (because it's NOT Windows). Just a short list of things that I think most of us here will agree are better: - Better user interface - Ease of use - Don't crash as much - Spyware/Viruses are virtually non-existant - High quality of craftsmanship - They're aesthetically pleasing - They last longer (I'm using a 7 year old computer and running the latest and greatest software available) - They can run Windows now, negating your entire argument about quantity of software available
__________________ Power Macintosh G4/500MHz "Yikes!" 10.4.11 Server • 1024MB • 3 x 120GB + 320GB • DVR-111D • 2 x Radeon 7000 PCI • 2 x 17" CRT MacBook 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo - White 10.5.5 • 2048MB • 80GB • CD-RW/DVD-ROM iPod Photo 60GB • iPod nano 1GB • AT&T DSL 6Mb/768k http://www.jeffhoppe.com |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Sorry for the sarky reply!
__________________ Kildare G.A.A. Offaly used 6 subs |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| Isn't "Monopoly" another name for "Windows" ... ? |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| I will backup what ElDiabloConCaca had to say. I run a now 6 year old G4 Power Mac upgraded the video card and RAM and I'm runing 10.4.6 server and Shake 4 and The whole Final Cut Studio pack. Works great. Now what almost 7 year old PC could you run Hollywood Apps on? With just upgradeing the video card and RAM? I also run 10.4.5 on my "PDQ" Wallstreet G3 233 Mhz 160 MB of RAM and a 100 GB hard drive. This laptop was stop being made in 1999. Now what x86 laptop could you run Windows XP on that was a P1 or maybe a low end P2. And still be able to have it be usefull to you. Seeing as I have came back to the Mac from the dark side I can tell you this XP can run on as low as a 200 Mhz P1 with as much as 250 MB of RAM but it will take at lest 10 mins for it to boot. Then that long for any other app to run. So I hope that helps you out to see why Apple hardware even realy old hardware can still kick a PCs butt any day of the week.
__________________ The Cam Report all about Mac Software and hardware and Gameing and Reviews The Cam Report, keeping an eye on eveything Apple. This is the RSS feed for those on the go. -- We are Microsoft of Borg. You will be assimilated. Stability is irrelevant. Where _you_ want to go to today is irrelevant. We will add your currency to our own. Bend over right now. Resistance is futile. -- |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
Like El Diablo said, why don't you just head down to the Apple Store?
__________________ • 2.66GHz Mac Pro Quad Xeon • 2.2GHz Santa Rosa MacBook Pro • 2.0GHz iMac Core Duo • 8GB iPhone |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| This is great | riccbhard | Bob's Place | 6 | May 27th, 2005 11:09 PM |
| system 7 macs and osx macs | mac_user | Networking & Compatibility | 1 | February 23rd, 2004 06:39 PM |
| Dual Macs+Radeon9700=Great gaming!? | hulkaros | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 17 | April 8th, 2003 05:05 PM |
| Default Folder X - a great product with a great attitude | edX | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 5 | March 1st, 2002 03:44 AM |
| G4 Not As Great.... | Jayem | Hardware & Peripherals | 4 | December 6th, 2001 08:50 AM |