|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I am writing because I believe the present approach to printing is just not user friendly. Most often than not any image printing results in multiple prints because something goes wrong. And honestly the "preiunter setup" and then "print" options should be only one (this is the case in some applications). In my sense, the computer is trying too often to understand what paper (legal, A4, A5, etc.) is in th eprinter so as to help the user. This does not always work. I would like to be able to say to "print" : I know I have A5 paper (because I just inserted it), so just print making the picture fit nicely and don't hassle me with other questions. A preview window providing final ok to the user that the printing will be successful. Just an idea...
__________________ I'm trying to understand...
|
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| You need to provide more specific information such as: 1. Your computer and its specs 2. Your printer and its specs 3. The program, its specs, that you're printing from Without those things, no one can really help you.
__________________ Powerpoint is not a design application |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| I'm not asking for help... this is an opinion forum. My opinion is that the print functionality does not have that "its easy" touch to it.
__________________ I'm trying to understand...
|
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| How is the computer going to know what kind of paper you've just inserted into the printer? Most (all?) consumer grade printers rely on the computer to specify what kind of paper is being fed in. The current method works. You only need to specify the type of paper once and it will stay that way until you decide to change it. |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| Very true, and in addition, most desktop USB printers (like sub-$200 printers from hp, LexMark, etc.) are pretty much plug-and-play, with no settings to configure at all. My last 3 hp printers were exactly that: plug them in, turn them on, Mac OS X recognizes them right off-the-bat, and my first print job is strictly a "press print and watch it come out" experience. Of course, with printers that have more advanced features, one would expect to have to adjust more settings... remember when TVs only had vertical- and horizontal-adjustment features? Now we control the aspect ratio, color balance, brightness, contrast, black level, mode, size, zoom, etc... all because we have more fully-featured TVs. In my opinion, it's the same with printers -- the more features it has, the more time it takes to configure a print job if it's a print job that uses those advanced features.
__________________ Power Macintosh G4/500MHz "Yikes!" 10.4.11 Server • 1024MB • 3 x 120GB + 320GB • DVR-111D • 2 x Radeon 7000 PCI • 2 x 17" CRT MacBook 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo - White 10.5.4 • 2048MB • 80GB • CD-RW/DVD-ROM iPod Photo 60GB • iPod nano 1GB • AT&T DSL 3Mb/512k http://www.jeffhoppe.com |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| Why didn't you say anything about the ink? Ink is one of the expensive liquids on Earth! Don't believe me, do the math yourself.
__________________ PowerMac G5 Dual 1.8(Rev A.), , 7 Gig RAM, Pioneer DVR-110, ATI X800XT, OS X 10.4.11 & 10.5.3, 23'' HD LCD Mac Book Pro Core 2 Duo 2.16Mhz, SuperDrive, ATI X1600, 2GB RAM, OS X 10.5.3 Tibook 400Mhz, DVD drive, 1024 RAM, ATI Rage, OS X 10.4.7 1TB Time Capsule 5g iPod 30Gig White |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Viro, Eldiabloconcaca all I can say is that selecting the paper size is not ALWAYS sufficient. Fact is, as Eldiabloconcaca indicated, most printers will defensively prohibit printing if it thinks the wrong paper size is inserted. Call me excessive, but when you print, you just want it to print. Try printing a small 3*3 figure on legal paper and get a 3*3 result. The printer/driver/whatever will go to extremes in trying to resize/crop/etc. the figure. Resulting in a printout which is not 3*3. There is a general confusion on printers that selecting the paper implies you want to fill that page especially when dealing with photos. etc. etc. So I d'ont think selecting the paper is the golden bullet!
__________________ I'm trying to understand...
|