image
image
Ticket Options
Question Details
TICKET ARCHIVE -> Hacktool.underhand
andha - May 4, 2005 - 2:48 pm
image
image
My Mac has been infected by a Trojan Horse called hacktool.underhand.
Norton Anti virus does not seem to be able to repair it.
Anyone can help me getting rid of it?
Thanks
bobw - May 4, 2005 - 3:04 pm
image
image
Hi Xavier

This seems to be a problem with only Nortons. It's been reported accross the web, but only by people using Nortons.

I would trash Nortons from your system. It's been reported to be causing other problems with OSX also.

There are no viruses, trojans or spyware that can affect Macs.


--------
Bobw - MacOSX.com Tech Support
bobw@macosx.com
bobw - May 5, 2005 - 2:24 pm
image
image
Xavier

More info;

First of all, this is not a "virus". It is a trojan, and can only be installed on your computer by you or someone else
with local/physical/administrative access.
But that is beside the point, because don't have this Trojan on your machine.


This is a FALSE POSITIVE because Symantec's signature for
detecting this tool was too broad! Since the swapfile has
large amounts of dynamically changing data, they're
apparently detecting the same overly-broad binary
snippet they're searching for in your swapfile.

REPEAT: YOU DO NOT HAVE THIS TROJAN IF YOU ARE
GETTING A NOTICE IT'S IN YOUR SWAPFILE.

Underhand is a conventional .app application bundle that
hides itself from the Dock and the normal user-space
running process listings. It can physically be searched for,
and its mode of operation is clear: it will be present in
your Login Items and process listings, and runs from the
user home directory's Library/Preferences folder. Yes,
names can be changed, etc., but it is fundamentally a Mac
OS X application bundle that runs interactively (albeit
invisibly) while a user is logged in. A signature, in the
context of AV detection, or anything else that defines it in
that manner is not present in swap, and that is technically
impossible. Therefore, this is a false positive, and the
detection scheme likely appeared in Symantec's most
recent definition update.

Symantec has CONFIRMED this and has issued new virus
definitions to fix their mistake:

http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT...05050417004611


--------
Bobw - MacOSX.com Tech Support
bobw@macosx.com

IF THIS IS YOUR QUESTION AND YOU WISH TO RESPOND, LOGIN HERE FIRST.


Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0